Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24733460›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2014

Predictive models for identification of hospitalized patients harboring KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae.

Mario Tumbarello, Enrico Maria Trecarichi, Fabio Tumietto, Valerio Del Bono, Francesco Giuseppe De Rosa, Matteo Bassetti, Angela Raffaella Losito, Sara Tedeschi, Carolina Saffioti, Silvia Corcione and 9 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Predictive value of extra-rectal colonization and theInfection prevention in practice · 2026
    Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. FromFrontiers in medicine · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Risk model and validation of carbapenem-resistantOpen medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Recommendations for antibiotic selection for severe nosocomial infections.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2021
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Predicting Carbapenem-ResistantOpen forum infectious diseases · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Emerging and re-emerging infectious disease in otorhinolaryngology.Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Mario TumbarelloInstitute of Infectious Diseases, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, A. Gemelli Hospital, Rome, Italy tumbarello@rm.unicatt.it.
Enrico Maria TrecarichiInstitute of Infectious Diseases, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, A. Gemelli Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Fabio TumiettoClinic of Infectious Diseases, University of Bologna, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy.
Valerio Del BonoClinic of Infectious Diseases, University of Genoa (DISSAL) and IRCCS San Martino-IST, Genoa, Italy.
Francesco Giuseppe De RosaDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Amedeo di Savoia Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Matteo BassettiInfectious Disease Division, Santa Maria Misericordia University Hospital, Udine, Italy.
Angela Raffaella LositoInstitute of Infectious Diseases, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, A. Gemelli Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Sara TedeschiClinic of Infectious Diseases, University of Bologna, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy.
Carolina SaffiotiClinic of Infectious Diseases, University of Genoa (DISSAL) and IRCCS San Martino-IST, Genoa, Italy.
Silvia CorcioneDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Amedeo di Savoia Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Maddalena GiannellaClinic of Infectious Diseases, University of Bologna, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy.
Francesca RaffaelliInstitute of Infectious Diseases, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, A. Gemelli Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Nicole PaganiDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Amedeo di Savoia Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Michele BartolettiClinic of Infectious Diseases, University of Bologna, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy.
Teresa SpanuInstitute of Microbiology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, A. Gemelli Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Anna MarcheseSection of Microbiology-DISC, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Roberto CaudaInstitute of Infectious Diseases, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, A. Gemelli Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Claudio ViscoliClinic of Infectious Diseases, University of Genoa (DISSAL) and IRCCS San Martino-IST, Genoa, Italy.
Pierluigi VialeClinic of Infectious Diseases, University of Bologna, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy.
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITOspedale Amedeo di Savoia · ITUniversity of Bologna · ITUniversity of Genoa · ITPoliclinico S.Orsola-Malpighi · ITIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITOspedale Santa Maria della Misericordia di Udine · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The production of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemases (KPCs) by Enterobacteriaceae has become a significant problem in recent years. To identify factors that could predict isolation of KPC-producing K. pneumoniae (KPCKP) in clinical samples from hospitalized patients, we conducted a retrospective, matched (1:2) case-control study in five large Italian hospitals. The case cohort consisted of adult inpatients whose hospital stay included at least one documented isolation of a KPCKP strain from a clinical specimen. For each case enrolled, we randomly selected two matched controls with no KPCKP-positive cultures of any type during their hospitalization. Matching involved hospital, ward, and month/year of admission, as well as time at risk for KPCKP isolation. A subgroup analysis was also carried out to identify risk factors specifically associated with true KPCKP infection. During the study period, KPCKP was isolated from clinical samples of 657 patients; 426 of these cases appeared to be true infections. Independent predictors of KPCKP isolation were recent admission to an intensive care unit (ICU), indwelling urinary catheter, central venous catheter (CVC), and/or surgical drain, ≥ 2 recent hospitalizations, hematological cancer, and recent fluoroquinolone and/or carbapenem therapy. A Charlson index of ≥ 3, indwelling CVC, recent surgery, neutropenia, ≥ 2 recent hospitalizations, and recent fluoroquinolone and/or carbapenem therapy were independent risk factors for KPCKP infection. Models developed to predict KPCKP isolation and KPCKP infection displayed good predictive power, with the areas under the receiver-operating characteristic curves of 0.82 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80 to 0.84) and 0.82 (95% CI, 0.80 to 0.85), respectively. This study provides novel information which might be useful for the clinical management of patients harboring KPCKP and for controlling the spread of this organism.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial Proteinsbeta-LactamasesCarbapenemsCase-Control StudiesCohort StudiesFemaleFluoroquinolonesHospitalizationHumansIntensive Care UnitsItalyKlebsiella InfectionsKlebsiella pneumoniaeAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial Proteinsbeta-LactamasescarbapenemaseCarbapenemsFluoroquinolones

Identifiers

PMID24733460
PMCPMC4068482
OpenAlexW2119948981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.