Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24733361›Full record

ReviewDevelopmental psychobiology2014

Filial attachment and its disruption: insights from the guinea pig.

Michael B Hennessy

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Developmental psychobiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michael B HennessyDepartment of Psychology, Wright State University, 335 Fawcett Hall, Dayton, OH, 45435. michael.hennessy@wright.edu.
Wright State University · US

Funding

STRESS-INDUCED SICKNESS SOCIAL SEPARATION: DEPRESSIONR15MH068228 · NIMH · WRIGHT STATE UNIVERSITY · PI HENNESSY, MICHAEL B · 2003 to 2013
$1.0M
NIMH NIH HHS MH068228NIMH NIH HHS R15 MH068228
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Guinea pigs are precocial rodents that show evidence of a selective attachment to the mother who, in turn, exhibits little active maternal care. Effects of separation in guinea pigs are, therefore, more likely to reflect the disruption of attachment than the removal of, or alterations in, patterns of maternal care. Here, effects in guinea pigs of the presence or absence of the mother on psychobiological endpoints and of maternal separation on depressive-like behavior are reviewed. It is argued that results with guinea pigs often align more closely with those of nonhuman primates than those of laboratory rats and mice, and that the guinea pig offers a valuable translational model for studies of the consequences of attachment and its disruption.

Indexed as

Maternal DeprivationModels, AnimalObject AttachmentAnimalsGuinea Pigsattachmentattachment disruptiondepressionguinea pigmaternal bufferingmaternal separationproinflammatorystress buffering

Identifiers

PMID24733361
PMCPMC4197192
OpenAlexW1594709752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.