Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24733343›Full record

ArticleCanadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien2014

Patient satisfaction with access and continuity of care in a multidisciplinary academic family medicine clinic.

Stephen Wetmore, Leslie Boisvert, Esther Graham, Susan Hall, Tim Hartley, Lynda Wright, Jo-Anne Hammond, Holly Ings, Barbara Lent, Anna Pawelec-Brzychczy and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Evaluation of multidisciplinary high-risk pregnancy clinic for myelomeningocele.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Evaluation of the quality of service delivery in private sector, primary care clinics in Kenya: A descriptive patient survey.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Patient Input in Regional Healthcare Planning-A Meaningful Contribution.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Stephen WetmoreDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Western Ontario, 1008-Western Centre for Public Health and Family Medicine, 1151 Richmond St, London, ON N6A 5C1. swetmore@uwo.ca.
Leslie Boisvert
Esther Graham
Susan Hall
Tim Hartley
Lynda Wright
Jo-Anne Hammond
Holly Ings
Barbara Lent
Anna Pawelec-Brzychczy
Stacey Valiquet
Jamie Wickett
Joanne Willing

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine patient satisfaction with care provided at a family medicine teaching clinic.

designMailed survey.

settingVictoria Family Medical Centre in London, Ont.

participantsStratified random sample of 600 regular patients of the clinic aged 18 years or older; 301 responses were received.

main outcome measuresPatient satisfaction with overall care, wait times for appointments, contact with physicians, and associated demographic factors. Logistic regression analysis and analysis were used to determine the significance of factors associated with satisfaction.

resultsThe response rate was 50%. Overall, 88% of respondents were fairly, very, or completely satisfied with care. Older patients tended to be more satisfied. Patients who were less satisfied had longer wait times for appointments (P < .001) and reduced continuity with specific doctors (P = .004). More satisfied patients also felt connected through other members of the health care team.

conclusionPatients were generally satisfied with the care provided at the family medicine teaching clinic. Older patients tended to be more satisfied than younger patients. Points of dissatisfaction were related to wait times for appointments and continuity with patients' usual doctors. These findings support the adoption of practices that reduce wait times and facilitate continuity with patients' usual doctors and other regular members of the health care team.

Indexed as

Continuity of Patient CareFamily PracticeHealth Services AccessibilityOutpatient Clinics, HospitalPatient Care TeamAcademic Medical CentersAdultAgedAge FactorsAppointments and SchedulesFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedOntario

Identifiers

PMID24733343
PMCPMC4046539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.