Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24733192›Full record

ArticleAnnals of internal medicine2014

Trends in prevalence and control of diabetes in the United States, 1988-1994 and 1999-2010.

Elizabeth Selvin, Christina M Parrinello, David B Sacks, Josef Coresh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of internal medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 299 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
299citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
54.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

299 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 528 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Impact of a Primary Care CKD Registry in a US Public Safety-Net Health Care Delivery System: A Pragmatic Randomized Trial.American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation · 2018
    Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

239 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elizabeth Selvin
Christina M Parrinello
David B Sacks
Josef Coresh
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

CARDIOVASCULAR EPIDEMIOLOGY INSTITUTIONAL TRAININGT32HL007024 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Elizabeth Selvin · 1985 to 2026
$17.5M
Diabetes and Prediabetes in Older Adults in ARICR01DK089174 · NIDDK · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SELVIN, ELIZABETH · 2011 to 2020
$6.4M
Intramural NIH HHSNHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007024NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK089174
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTrends in the prevalence and control of diabetes defined by hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels are important for health care policy and planning.

objectiveTo update trends in the prevalence of diabetes, prediabetes, and glycemic control.

designCross-sectional.

settingNHANES (National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey) in 1988-1994 and 1999-2010.

participantsAdults aged 20 years or older. MEASUREMENTS: We used calibrated HbA1c levels to define undiagnosed diabetes (≥6.5%); prediabetes (5.7% to 6.4%); and, among persons with diagnosed diabetes, glycemic control (<7.0% or <8.0%). Trends in HbA1c categories were compared with fasting glucose levels (≥7.0 mmol/L [≥126 mg/dL] and 5.6 to 6.9 mmol/L [100 to 125 mg/dL]).

resultsIn 2010, approximately 21 million U.S. adults aged 20 years or older had total confirmed diabetes (self-reported diabetes or diagnostic levels for both fasting glucose and calibrated HbA1c). During 2 decades, the prevalence of total confirmed diabetes increased, but the prevalence of undiagnosed diabetes remained fairly stable, reducing the proportion of total diabetes cases that are undiagnosed to 11% in 2005-2010. The prevalence of prediabetes was lower when defined by calibrated HbA1c levels than when defined by fasting glucose levels but has increased from 5.8% in 1988-1994 to 12.4% in 2005-2010 when defined by HbA1c levels. Glycemic control improved overall, but total diabetes prevalence was greater and diabetes was less controlled among non-Hispanic blacks and Mexican Americans compared with non-Hispanic whites. LIMITATION: Cross-sectional design.

conclusionOver the past 2 decades, the prevalence of total diabetes has increased substantially. However, the proportion of undiagnosed diabetes cases decreased, suggesting improvements in screening and diagnosis. Among the growing number of persons with diagnosed diabetes, glycemic control improved but remains a challenge, particularly among non-Hispanic blacks and Mexican Americans. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Institutes of Health.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBlack or African AmericanBlack PeopleBlood GlucoseComorbidityCross-Sectional StudiesDiabetes MellitusFastingFemaleGlucose Tolerance TestGlycated HemoglobinHumansMaleMexican AmericansNutrition SurveysBlood GlucoseGlycated Hemoglobin

Identifiers

PMID24733192
PMCPMC4442608
OpenAlexW1996716751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.