Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24733067›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2014

Differential signaling by protease-activated receptors: implications for therapeutic targeting.

Tejminder S Sidhu, Shauna L French, Justin R Hamilton

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Receptors and host factors: key players in human metapneumovirus infection.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Protease-activated receptors: An illustrated review.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2021
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. PAR4 (Protease-Activated Receptor 4): PARticularly Important 4 Antiplatelet Therapy.Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. C1-inhibitor influence on platelet activation by thrombin receptors agonists.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tejminder S SidhuAustralian Centre for Blood Diseases & Department of Clinical Haematology, Monash University, Melbourne 3004, Australia. tejminder.sidhu@monash.edu.
Shauna L FrenchAustralian Centre for Blood Diseases & Department of Clinical Haematology, Monash University, Melbourne 3004, Australia. shauna.french@monash.edu.
Justin R HamiltonAustralian Centre for Blood Diseases & Department of Clinical Haematology, Monash University, Melbourne 3004, Australia. justin.hamilton@monash.edu.
Monash University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protease-activated receptors (PARs) are a family of four G protein-coupled receptors that exhibit increasingly appreciated differences in signaling and regulation both within and between the receptor class. By nature of their proteolytic self-activation mechanism, PARs have unique processes of receptor activation, "ligand" binding, and desensitization/resensitization. These distinctive aspects have presented both challenges and opportunities in the targeting of PARs for therapeutic benefit-the most notable example of which is inhibition of PAR1 on platelets for the prevention of arterial thrombosis. However, more recent studies have uncovered further distinguishing features of PAR-mediated signaling, revealing mechanisms by which identical proteases elicit distinct effects in the same cell, as well as how distinct proteases produce different cellular consequences via the same receptor. Here we review this differential signaling by PARs, highlight how important distinctions between PAR1 and PAR4 are impacting on the progress of a new class of anti-thrombotic drugs, and discuss how these more recent insights into PAR signaling may present further opportunities for manipulating PAR activation and signaling in the development of novel therapies.

Indexed as

Blood PlateletsDimerizationFibrinolytic AgentsHumansProtein CReceptors, Proteinase-ActivatedReceptors, ThrombinSepsisSignal TransductionThrombosisFibrinolytic AgentsProtein CReceptors, Proteinase-ActivatedReceptors, Thrombin

Identifiers

PMID24733067
PMCPMC4013622
OpenAlexW1998678081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.