Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24732868›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of gastroenterology2014

Acid-based parameters on pH-impedance testing predict symptom improvement with medical management better than impedance parameters.

Amit Patel, Gregory S Sayuk, C Prakash Gyawali

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of gastroenterology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. ACG Clinical Guidelines: Clinical Use of Esophageal Physiologic Testing.The American journal of gastroenterology · 2020
    Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Non-acid Reflux: What to Do When You Don't Feel the Burn.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Observational
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amit PatelDivision of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA.
Gregory S SayukDivision of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA.
C Prakash GyawaliDivision of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA.
Washington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Washington University DDRCC Supplemental Equipment RequestP30DK052574 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Nicholas O. Davidson · 2000 to 2026
$30.8M
CLINICAL/LABORATORY TRAINING ACADEMIC GASTROENTEROLOGYT32DK007130 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MATTHEW AARON CIORBA · 1986 to 2026
$8.3M
Pilot Prospective Study of Minor Papilla Endoscopic Sphincterotomy for Pancreas DR21DK084413 · NIDDK · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI ROMAGNUOLO, JOSEPH · 2010 to 2011
$443k
NIDDK NIH HHS 5P30 DK 052574-14-APNIDDK NIH HHS K23DK84413-4 -GSSNIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK052574NIDDK NIH HHS R21 DK084413NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007130
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivespH-impedance testing detects reflux events irrespective of pH, but its value in predicting treatment outcome is unclear. We prospectively evaluated subjects treated medically after pH-impedance testing to determine predictors of symptom improvement.

methodsSubjects referred for pH-impedance testing completed questionnaires in which dominant symptoms and global symptom severity (GSS) were recorded. Acid-reflux parameters (acid-exposure time, AET; symptom association by Ghillebert probability estimate, GPE; symptom index, SI) and impedance reflux parameters (reflux-exposure time, RET; number of reflux events; GPE and SI with impedance data) were extracted. Symptoms and GSS were prospectively reevaluated after medical therapy. Univariate and multivariate analyses determined predictors of GSS improvement following medical management.

resultsOver 5 years, 128 subjects (mean 53.3±1.3 years, 66.4% female; typical symptoms 57.0%, 53.9% tested on therapy) underwent pH-impedance testing and subsequent medical therapy for reflux symptoms, and completed required questionnaires. On follow-up 3.35±0.14 years later, mean GSS declined by 45.0%, with 42.2% patients reporting ≥50% GSS improvement. On univariate analysis, total AET, AET≥4.0%, and GPE for all reflux events predicted both linear and ≥50% GSS improvement, but RET and number of reflux events did not. On multivariate analysis, controlling for testing on or off therapy, only AET (P=0.003) and GPE for all reflux events (P=0.029) predicted GSS improvement.

conclusionsAcid-based reflux parameters offer greater value over impedance-based nonacid-reflux parameters in predicting symptomatic responses to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy. Our findings support conducting pH-impedance studies off PPI therapy to maximize clinical utility in predicting outcome.

Indexed as

Electric ImpedanceAdultAgedEsophageal pH MonitoringEsophagusFemaleGastroesophageal RefluxHumansHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID24732868
PMCPMC4104528
OpenAlexW2017153717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.