Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24732779›Full record

ArticleCells, tissues, organs2013

Mouse genetic background influences the dental phenotype.

Yong Li, William S Konicki, J Timothy Wright, Cynthia Suggs, Hui Xue, Melissa A Kuehl, Ashok B Kulkarni, Carolyn W Gibson

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cells, tissues, organs, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Challenges of Studying Amelogenesis in Gene-Targeted Mouse Models.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Yong LiDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology, School of Dental Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa., USA.
William S Konicki
J Timothy Wright
Cynthia Suggs
Hui Xue
Melissa A Kuehl
Ashok B Kulkarni
Carolyn W Gibson
University of Pennsylvania · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USCalifornia University of Pennsylvania · USNational Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research · US

Funding

Molecular Roles of Cdk5 in Neuronal Functions and Pain SignalingZIADE000664 · NIDCR · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DENTAL & CRANIOFACIAL RESEARCH · PI KULKARNI, ASHOK · 2009 to 2025
$20.4M
ENAMEL MINERAL FORMATION DURING MURINE ODONTOGENESISR01DE011089 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI GIBSON, CAROLYN · 1995 to 2012
$3.9M
NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE011089NIDCR NIH HHS R01-DE011089
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dental enamel covers the crown of the vertebrate tooth and is considered to be the hardest tissue in the body. Enamel develops during secretion of an extracellular matrix by ameloblast cells in the tooth germ, prior to eruption of the tooth into the oral cavity. Secreted enamel proteins direct mineralization patterns during the maturation stage of amelogenesis as the tooth prepares to erupt. The amelogenins are the most abundant enamel proteins and are required for normal enamel development. Phenotypic differences were observed between incisors from individual Amelx (amelogenin) null mice that had a mixed 129xC57BL/6J genetic background and between inbred wild-type (WT) mice with different genetic backgrounds (C57BL/6J, C3H/HeJ, FVB/NJ). We hypothesized that this could be due to modifier genes, as human patients with a mutation in an enamel protein gene causing the enamel defect amelogenesis imperfecta (AI) can also have varied appearance of dentitions within a kindred. Enamel density measurements varied for all WT inbred strains midway during incisor development. Enamel thickness varied between some WT strains, and, unexpectedly, dentin density varied extensively between incisors and molars of all WT and Amelx null strains studied. WTFVB/NJ incisors were more similar to those of Amelx null mice than to those of the other WT strains in terms of incisor height/width ratio and pattern of enamel mineralization. Strain-specific differences led to the conclusion that modifier genes may be implicated in determining both normal development and severity of enamel appearance in AI mouse models and may in future studies be related to phenotypic heterogeneity within human AI kindreds reported in the literature.

Indexed as

AmeloblastsAmelogenesisAmelogeninAnimalsDental EnamelDental Enamel ProteinsExtracellular MatrixIncisorMiceMice, Inbred C3HMice, Inbred C57BLMice, KnockoutTooth CrownAmelogeninDental Enamel Proteins

Identifiers

PMID24732779
PMCPMC4079555
OpenAlexW1992712446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.