ArticleHeart rhythm2014
Oral contraceptive use and the risk of cardiac events in patients with long QT syndrome.
Article in Heart rhythm, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Preventing and Treating Torsades de Pointes in the Mother, Fetus and Newborn in the Highest Risk Pregnancies with Inherited Arrhythmia Syndromes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Contraceptive Strategies in Women With Heart Failure or With Cardiac Transplantation.Current heart failure reports · 2018Review
- From Default Mode Network to the Basal Configuration: Sex Differences in the Resting-State Brain Connectivity as a Function of Age and Their Clinical Correlates.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2018Article
- Management of Patients with Long QT Syndrome.Korean circulation journal · 2016Review
- Deranged sodium to sudden death.The Journal of physiology · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn prior clinical studies of patients with long QT syndrome (LQTS), pregnancy was associated with fewer cardiac events (CEs) compared to before or after pregnancy. In recent animal studies involving rabbits with LQTS mutations, progesterone had favorable effects on CEs compared to estrogen. The effect of oral contraceptive therapy with its high progesterone/estrogen ratio on the risk of CEs in patients with LQTS has not been examined.
objectiveTo study the effect of oral contraceptive use on the risk of CEs in patients with LQTS.
methodsWe studied 174 patients from the Rochester-based LQTS Registry who responded to a questionnaire about their oral contraceptive use. We used time-dependent Cox regression to estimate the hazard ratio for recurrent CEs when patients were using vs not using oral contraceptives during nonpregnancy periods. For this recurrent events analysis, the Prentice-Williams-Peterson model was used and the time origin was defined as the onset of menarche. We adjusted for the baseline corrected QT interval, history of CEs before menarche, age at menarche onset, number of births, time-dependent β-blocker therapy, and LQTS genotype.
resultsNo differences in the risk of CEs for the times patients with LQTS were using vs not using oral contraceptives was found in the general population with LQTS (hazard ratio 1.01; P = .95) or in analyses of LQTS subsets (P > .2).
conclusionOral contraceptive therapy use did not affect LQTS-related CEs in the study population. Oral contraceptives did not show beneficial or harmful effects in this patient group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.