Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24732070›Full record

ArticleHearing research2014

Selective attention reduces physiological noise in the external ear canals of humans. II: visual attention.

Kyle P Walsh, Edward G Pasanen, Dennis McFadden

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hearing research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Changes in otoacoustic emissions during selective auditory and visual attention.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2015
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kyle P WalshDepartment of Psychology, Center for Perceptual Systems, 1 University Station A8000, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712-1043, United States. Electronic address: kpwalsh@umn.edu.
Edward G PasanenDepartment of Psychology, Center for Perceptual Systems, 1 University Station A8000, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712-1043, United States.
Dennis McFaddenDepartment of Psychology, Center for Perceptual Systems, 1 University Station A8000, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712-1043, United States.
The University of Texas at Austin · US

Funding

Group and Individual Differences in AuditionR01DC000153 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AUSTIN · PI MCFADDEN, DENNIS · 1989 to 2010
$5.3M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC000153
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human subjects performed in several behavioral conditions requiring, or not requiring, selective attention to visual stimuli. Specifically, the attentional task was to recognize strings of digits that had been presented visually. A nonlinear version of the stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission (SFOAE), called the nSFOAE, was collected during the visual presentation of the digits. The segment of the physiological response discussed here occurred during brief silent periods immediately following the SFOAE-evoking stimuli. For all subjects tested, the physiological-noise magnitudes were substantially weaker (less noisy) during the tasks requiring the most visual attention. Effect sizes for the differences were >2.0. Our interpretation is that cortico-olivo influences adjusted the magnitude of efferent activation during the SFOAE-evoking stimulation depending upon the attention task in effect, and then that magnitude of efferent activation persisted throughout the silent period where it also modulated the physiological noise present. Because the results were highly similar to those obtained when the behavioral conditions involved auditory attention, similar mechanisms appear to operate both across modalities and within modalities. Supplementary measurements revealed that the efferent activation was spectrally global, as it was for auditory attention.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAdultAttentionAuditory PerceptionCochleaEar CanalFemaleHumansMaleNoiseOtoacoustic Emissions, SpontaneousPhoneticsPhotic StimulationVisual PerceptionYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID24732070
PMCPMC4059011
OpenAlexW1982779708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.