ArticleBMC psychiatry2014
A qualitative process evaluation of electronic session-by-session outcome measurement in child and adolescent mental health services.
Article in BMC psychiatry, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Qualitative perceptions of child and youth mental health services by caregivers in the WHO European Region: a systematic review of qualitative literature.European journal of public health · 2026Pooled it
- Psychotherapists' Experience with In-Session Use of Routine Outcome Monitoring: A Qualitative Meta-analysis.Administration and policy in mental health · 2025Pooled it
- Assessing the feasibility of a web-based outcome measurement system in child and adolescent mental health services - myHealthE a randomised controlled feasibility pilot study.Child and adolescent mental health · 2023Trial
- Study of user experience of an objective test (QbTest) to aid ADHD assessment and medication management: a multi-methods approach.BMC psychiatry · 2017Trial
- Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Fetal Medicine: A Pilot Feasibility Study.Prenatal diagnosis · 2025Article
- Personalized and collaborative use of digital measurement-based care tools enhances engagement among young adults: a mixed-methods study.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Routine use of patient-reported experience and outcome measures for children and young people: a scoping review.Systematic reviews · 2024Article
- Article
- Complexity and potentials of clinical feedback in mental health: an in-depth study of patient processes.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2021Article
- A qualitative evaluation of Veterans Health Administration's implementation of measurement-based care in behavioral health.Psychological services · 2020Article
- Development of a transdiagnostic, low-intensity, psychological intervention for common adolescent mental health problems in Indian secondary schools.Behaviour research and therapy · 2020Article
- The development of PROmunication: a training-tool for clinicians using patient-reported outcomes to promote patient-centred communication in clinical cancer settings.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2020Article
- How do patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) support clinician-patient communication and patient care? A realist synthesis.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2018Review
- Development and validation of MyLifeTracker: a routine outcome measure for youth mental health.Psychology research and behavior management · 2018Article
- Using Patient Reported Outcome Measures to Improve Service Effectiveness (UPROMISE): Training clinicians to Use Outcome Measures in Child Mental Health.Administration and policy in mental health · 2016Article
- Developing mHealth Remote Monitoring Technology for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: A Qualitative Study Eliciting User Priorities and Needs.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2016Article
- The challenges of implementing ADHD clinical guidelines and research best evidence in routine clinical care settings: Delphi survey and mixed-methods study.BJPsych open · 2016Article
- The use of routine outcome monitoring in child semi-residential psychiatry: predicting parents' completion rates.Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health · 2015Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRegular monitoring of patient progress is important to assess the clinical effectiveness of an intervention. Recently, initiatives within UK child and adolescent mental health services (CAMHS) have advocated the use of session-by-session monitoring to continually evaluate the patient's outcome throughout the course of the intervention. However, the feasibility and acceptability of such regular monitoring is unknown.
methodSemi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with clinicians (n = 10), administrative staff (n = 8) and families (n = 15) who participated in a feasibility study of an electronic session-by-session outcome monitoring tool, (SxS), which is based on the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). This study took place in three CAMHS clinics in Nottinghamshire. The interview transcripts were thematically analysed.
resultsWe found clinicians accepted the need to complete outcome measures, particularly valuing those completed by the patient. However, there were some difficulties with engaging clinicians in this practice and in the training offered. Generally, patients were supportive of completing SxS in the waiting room prior to the clinic session and assistance with the process from administrative staff was seen to be a key factor. Clinicians and families found the feedback reports created from SxS to be helpful for tracking progress, facilitating communication and engagement, and as a point of reflection. The use of technology was considered positively, although some technological difficulties hindered the completion of SxS. Clinicians and families appreciated the brevity of SxS, but some were concerned that a short questionnaire could not adequately encapsulate the complexity of the patient's issues.
conclusionsThe findings show the need for appropriate infrastructure, mandatory training, and support to enable an effective system of session-by-session monitoring. Our findings indicate that clinicians, administrative staff and young people and their parents/carers would support regular monitoring if the system is easy to implement, with a standard 'clinic-wide' adoption of the procedure, and the resulting data are clinically useful.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.