Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24731599›Full record

Trial reportActa veterinaria Scandinavica2014

Effects of Artemisia annua and Foeniculum vulgare on chickens highly infected with Eimeria tenella (phylum Apicomplexa).

Liviu Drăgan, Adriana Györke, Jorge F S Ferreira, Ioan A Pop, Ioan Dunca, Maria Drăgan, Viorica Mircean, Iosif Dan, Vasile Cozma

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Acta veterinaria Scandinavica, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. The Beneficial Use ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Frontiers in immunology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Effects ofFrontiers in physiology · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Diagnosis and control of chicken coccidiosis: a recent update.Journal of parasitic diseases : official organ of the Indian Society for Parasitology · 2018
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Anticoccidial effects of herbal extracts on Eimeria tenella infection in broiler chickens: in vitro and in vivo study.Journal of parasitic diseases : official organ of the Indian Society for Parasitology · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Liviu Drăgan
Adriana GyörkeFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Parasitology and Parasitic Diseases Department, University of Agricultural Science and Veterinary Medicine Cluj Napoca, 3-5 Calea Mănăştur, 400372 Cluj-Napoca, Romania. titilincua@yahoo.com.
Jorge F S Ferreira
Ioan A Pop
Ioan Dunca
Maria Drăgan
Viorica Mircean
Iosif Dan
Vasile Cozma
University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Cluj-Napoca · ROU.S. Salinity Laboratory · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntensive poultry production systems depend on chemoprophylaxis with anticoccidial drugs to combat infection. A floor-pen study was conducted to evaluate the anticoccidial effect of Artemisia annua and Foeniculum vulgare on Eimeria tenella infection. Five experimental groups were established: negative control (untreated, unchallenged); positive control (untreated, challenged); a group medicated with 125 ppm lasalocid and challenged; a group medicated with A. annua leaf powder at 1.5% in feed and challenged; and a group treated with the mixed oils of A. annua and Foeniculum vulgare in equal parts, 7.5% in water and challenged. The effects of A. annua and oil extract of A. annua + F. vulgare on E. tenella infection were assessed by clinical signs, mortality, fecal oocyst output, faeces, lesion score, weight gain, and feed conversion.

resultsClinical signs were noticed only in three chickens from the lasalocid group, six from the A. annua group, and nine from the A. annua + F. vulgare group, but were present in 19 infected chickens from the positive control group. Bloody diarrhea was registered in only two chickens from A. annua group, but in 17 chickens from the positive control group. Mortality also occurred in the positive control group (7/20). Chickens treated with A. annua had a significant reduction in faecal oocysts (95.6%; P = 0.027) and in lesion score (56.3%; P = 0.005) when compared to the positive control. At the end of experiment, chickens treated with A. annua leaf powder had the highest body weight gain (68.2 g/day), after the negative control group, and the best feed conversion (1.85) among all experimental groups.

conclusionsOur results suggest that A. annua leaf powder (Aa-p), at 1.5% of the daily diet post-infection, can be a valuable alternative for synthetic coccidiostats, such as lasalocid.

Indexed as

Animal FeedAnimalsArtemisia annuaChickensCoccidiosisCoccidiostatsDietDietary SupplementsEimeria tenellaFoeniculumOils, VolatilePlant LeavesPoultry DiseasesCoccidiostatsOils, Volatile

Identifiers

PMID24731599
PMCPMC3998236
OpenAlexW2102339166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.