Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24731473›Full record

ReviewTranslational oncology2014

The implications of hyponitroxia in cancer.

Bryan Oronsky, Gary R Fanger, Neil Oronsky, Susan Knox, Jan Scicinski

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Translational oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. The dichotomous role of HBiochemical pharmacology · 2018
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. A549 cells adapted to high nitric oxide show reduced surface CEACAM expression and altered adhesion and migration properties.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bryan OronskyRadioRx, Inc., Mountain View, CA, USA.
Gary R FangerRadioRx, Inc., Mountain View, CA, USA.
Neil OronskyCFLS, San Jose, CA, USA.
Susan KnoxDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA, USA.
Jan ScicinskiRadioRx, Inc., Mountain View, CA, USA. Electronic address: jscicinski@radiorx.com.
Stanford Medicine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumors are spatially heterogeneous, with regions of relative hypoxia and normoxia. The tumor microenvironment is an important determinant of both tumor growth and response to a variety of cytotoxic and targeted therapies. In the tumor microenvironment, reactive oxygen species and nitric oxide (NO) are important mediators of the level of expression of many transcription factors and signaling cascades that affect tumor growth and responses to therapy. The primary objective of this review is to explore and discuss the seemingly dichotomous actions of NO in cancer biology as both a tumor promoter and suppressor with an emphasis on understanding the role of persistently low NO concentrations or hyponitroxia as a key mediator in tumor progression. This review will also discuss the potential role of hyponitroxia as a novel therapeutic target to treat cancer and outline an approach that provides new opportunities for pharmacological intervention.

Identifiers

PMID24731473
PMCPMC4101386
OpenAlexW2016519101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.