Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24731111›Full record

Trial reportPsychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors2014

The comparative effectiveness of individual and group brief motivational interventions for mandated college students.

John T P Hustad, Nadine R Mastroleo, Lan Kong, Rachel Urwin, Suzanne Zeman, Linda Lasalle, Brian Borsari

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

John T P HustadDepartment of Medicine and Public Health Sciences, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine.
Nadine R MastroleoCenter for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University.
Lan KongDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine.
Rachel UrwinUniversity Health Services, Pennsylvania State University.
Suzanne ZemanUniversity Health Services, Pennsylvania State University.
Linda LasalleUniversity Health Services, Pennsylvania State University.
Brian BorsariMental Health and Behavioral Sciences Service, Providence VA Medical Center.
Pennsylvania State University · USDepartment of Public Health · MMJohn Brown University · USProvidence VA Medical Center · US

Funding

Penn State Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR000127 · NCATS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI SINOWAY, LAWRENCE I · 2012 to 2015
$17.1M
Penn State Clinical and Translational Science InstituteKL2TR000126 · NCATS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI SINOWAY, LAWRENCE I · 2012 to 2015
$3.2M
Stepped Care for Mandated College StudentsR01AA015518 · NIAAA · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI BORSARI, BRIAN · 2005 to 2009
$1.5M
Within-Session Mechanisms of Behavior Change in At-Risk College StudentsR01AA017427 · NIAAA · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI BORSARI, BRIAN · 2009 to 2012
$1.5M
Sequential and Component Analyses of MI Mechanisms with College DrinkersR01AA017874 · NIAAA · CHILDREN'S MERCY HOSP (KANSAS CITY, MO) · PI APODACA, TIMOTHY R · 2009 to 2011
$726k
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000126NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000127NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA015518NIAAA NIH HHS R01-AA015518NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA017427NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA017874NIAAA NIH HHS R01-AA017874
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individual brief motivational intervention (iBMI) is an efficacious strategy to reduce heavy drinking by students who are mandated to receive an alcohol intervention following an alcohol-related event. However, despite the strong empirical support for iBMI, it is unknown if the results from rigorously controlled research on iBMI translate to real-world settings. Furthermore, many colleges lack the resources to provide iBMI to mandated students. Therefore, group-delivered BMI (gBMI) might be a cost-effective alternative that can be delivered to a large number of individuals. The purpose of this study was to conduct a comparative effectiveness evaluation of iBMI and gBMI as delivered by staff at a university health services center. Participants (N = 278) were college students who were mandated to receive an alcohol intervention following an alcohol-related incident. Participants were randomized to receive an individual (iBMI; n = 133) or a Group BMI (gBMI; n = 145). Results indicated that both iBMI and gBMI participants reduced their peak estimated blood alcohol concentration (BAC) and the number of negative alcohol-related consequences at 1-, 3-, and 6-months postintervention. The iBMI and gBMI conditions were not significantly different at follow-up. These findings provide preliminary support for the use of iBMI and gBMIs for college students in real-world settings.

Indexed as

Outcome Assessment, Health CareAdultAlcohol-Related DisordersFemaleHumansMaleMandatory ProgramsMotivationPsychotherapy, BriefPsychotherapy, GroupStudentsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID24731111
PMCPMC4062841
OpenAlexW2024887895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.