Trial reportThe Angle orthodontist2014
Effect of the bracket types on microbial colonization and periodontal status.
Trial report in The Angle orthodontist, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.
- Microbial colonisation associated with conventional and self-ligating brackets: a systematic review.Journal of orthodontics · 2022Pooled it
- Effectiveness, efficiency and adverse effects of using direct or indirect bonding technique in orthodontic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC oral health · 2019Pooled it
- The microbial changes in subgingival plaques of orthodontic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials.BMC oral health · 2017Pooled it
- Periodontitis and Periodontal Conditions in Systemically Healthy Children and Adolescents.Journal of clinical periodontology · 2026Review
- Orthodontic Appliance Type and Oral Malodor Burden: Cross-Sectional Comparison of Clear Aligners, Fixed Braces, and Untreated Controls.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- Effect of conventional and self-ligating brackets on periodontal health. Systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2024Review
- White Spot Lesions (WSLs)-Post-Orthodontic Occurrence, Management and Treatment Alternatives: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Short- term effect of probioticJournal of oral microbiology · 2022Article
- The Oral Microbiota Changes in Orthodontic Patients and Effects on Oral Health: An Overview.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- Effect of fixed orthodontic treatment on oral microbiota and salivary proteins.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2019Article
- Changes in oral microbiota due to orthodontic appliances: a systematic review.Journal of oral microbiology · 2018Review
- Effect of fixed orthodontic appliances on self-assessment and diagnosis of halitosis in undergraduate dental students.Journal of Indian Society of PeriodontologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the effect of different bracket types on the levels of Streptococcus mutans (SM) and Lactobacillus (LB) in saliva, in plaque, and on the periodontal condition. MATERIALS AND
methodsForty patients aged 14 to 16 years, who had Angle Class I malocclusion with minimal crowding, were nonsmokers, were without systematic disease, and did not use antibiotics or oral mouth rinses during the 3-month period before the study were randomly selected. The patients were subdivided into two groups with random allocation of bracket type: conventional brackets (CB; Avex Mx, OPAL orth.) with steel wire ligature or self-ligating brackets (SLB; F1000, Leone S.p.A.). Microbial and periodontal records were obtained before bonding (T1) and 1 month after bonding (T2). Microbial samples were collected from the stimulated saliva and the plaque from the labial surfaces of the upper and lower lateral incisors. To estimate the number of colony-forming units of SM and LB, Dentocult SM and LB kits were used. The plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), and pocket depth (PD) values were recorded to evaluate the periodontal condition. Paired t-test and Mann-Whitney U-test were used to compare the groups statistically.
resultsNo significant differences occurred in SM or LB colonization between the groups. In the SLB group, PI, GI, and PD values increased significantly (P < .05). A greater increase was found in PD value in the SLB group (0.98 mm) compared with the CB group (0.04 mm; P < .05).
conclusionsThe F1000 SLB do not have an advantage over Avex Mx CB with respect to periodontal status and colonization of SM and LB.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.