Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24729985›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurology & translational neuroscience2013

Bilateral Synergy: A Framework for Post-Stroke Rehabilitation.

Rl Sainburg, D Good, A Przybyla

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurology & translational neuroscience, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06999876 (The Effect of Combined Transcranial Pulse Current Stimulation), which is not on this map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06999876 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Combined Transcranial Pulse Current Stimulation (tPCS) and Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) on Lower Limb Motor Function in Subacute to Chronic Stroke Patients With Hemiplegia: A Double-blind, Sham-controlled, Randomized Controlled Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational University Health System, SingaporeRan2025 to 2026Enrolled90ConditionsStroke Patients With Hemiplegia or Hemiparesis in the Subacute StageArmsThe AscenZ-VIII Stimulator (Investigational Medical Device)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Robot enhanced stroke therapy optimizes rehabilitation (RESTORE): a pilot study.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2021
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Force/moment tracking performance during constant-pose, force-varying, bilaterally symmetric, hand-wrist tasks.Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology · 2023
    Article
  12. Adaptive control is reversed between hands after left hemisphere stroke and lost following right hemisphere stroke.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rl SainburgDepartment of Kinesiology, Pennsylvania State University, USA.
D GoodDepartment of Neurology, Penn State Hershey Medical Center, USA.
A Przybyla

Funding

Predicting Ipsilesional Motor Deficits in Stroke with Dynamic Dominance ModelR01HD059783 · NICHD · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI SAINBURG, ROBERT L, WINSTEIN, CAROLEE J · 2010 to 2023
$5.3M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD059783
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnilateral stroke produces debilitating deficits in voluntary control in the contralesional arm, and significant motor coordination deficits in the ipsilesional arm. In addition, patients tend to avoid bilateral arm patterns and during performance of activities of daily living. Nevertheless, upper extremity physical rehabilitation predominantly focuses on motor training activities with only the paretic arm. This can be limiting because of persistent deficits in the ipsilesional arm, and because of the tendency of patients to avoid spontaneous bilateral arm patterns. PROPOSITION: Rehabilitation should focus on bilateral training to advance recovery of function in both arms of stroke patients, as well as to facilitate spontaneous bilateral arm use. This paper reviews the rationale for this approach, citing evidence for significant hemisphere specific bilateral motor deficits in stroke patients, which affect both the contralesional and the ipsilesional arm. The rationale for, and advantages of, training both arms simultaneously through bilateral tasks is reviewed. Although bilateral training has been employed to treat stroke patients previously, this has tended to focus on bimanual 'coupling' as a rationale for performing parallel, but not cooperative bilateral tasks. Bilateral synergy provides a more functional framework for structuring post-stroke upper extremity rehabilitation.

conclusionBilateral synergy may be causally linked to spontaneous bilateral arm use, suggesting that rehabilitation should be focused on bilateral cooperative tasks, such as bilateral object transport. Further research is required to determine whether this approach could be efficacious for patients with hemiparesis, and whether both left and right hemisphere strokes can benefit from such intervention.

Indexed as

Bilateral coordinationLateralizationRehabilitationStroke

Identifiers

PMID24729985
PMCPMC3984050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.