ArticleCurrent opinion in chemical engineering2014
Integrating
Article in Current opinion in chemical engineering, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- A multi-organ atlas of microcirculatory signatures for systemic profiling of diabetic and therapeutic states.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Flow-driven construction of capillary-scale vessels with predefined geometries in natural hydrogels.Materials today. Bio · 2025Article
- Programming microphysiological systems for children's health protection.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2017Article
- Challenges and Opportunities to Harnessing the (Hematopoietic) Stem Cell Niche.Current stem cell reports · 2016Article
- Google Glass-Directed Monitoring and Control of Microfluidic Biosensors and Actuators.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- From cardiac tissue engineering to heart-on-a-chip: beating challenges.Biomedical materials (Bristol, England) · 2015Review
- A cost-effective fluorescence mini-microscope for biomedical applications.Lab on a chip · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There is significant interest within the tissue engineering and pharmaceutical industries to create 3D microphysiological systems of human organ function. The interest stems from a growing concern that animal models and simple 2D culture systems cannot replicate essential features of human physiology that are critical to predict drug response, or simply to develop new therapeutic strategies to repair or replace damaged organs. Central to human organ function is a microcirculation that not only enhances the rate of nutrient and waste transport by convection, but also provides essential additional physiological functions that can be specific to each organ. This review highlights progress in the creation of
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.