Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24729916›Full record

ArticleJournal of analytical methods in chemistry2014

Simultaneous determination of cortisol and cortisone from human serum by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

Sanghoo Lee, Hwan-Sub Lim, Hye-Jin Shin, Seol-A Kim, Jimyeong Park, Hyun-Chul Kim, Hyogyeong Kim, Hyung Joo Kim, Yun-Tae Kim, Kyoung-Ryul Lee and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of analytical methods in chemistry, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Nanomaterials for Cortisol Sensing.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The VScientific reports · 2021
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sanghoo LeeDepartment of Bioanalysis, Seoul Medical Science Institute & Seoul Clinical Laboratories, Seoul 152-766, Republic of Korea.
Hwan-Sub LimDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Kwandong University College of Medicine, Gangneung 210-701, Republic of Korea.
Hye-Jin ShinDepartment of Bioanalysis, Seoul Medical Science Institute & Seoul Clinical Laboratories, Seoul 152-766, Republic of Korea.
Seol-A KimDepartment of Bioanalysis, Seoul Medical Science Institute & Seoul Clinical Laboratories, Seoul 152-766, Republic of Korea.
Jimyeong ParkDepartment of Bioanalysis, Seoul Medical Science Institute & Seoul Clinical Laboratories, Seoul 152-766, Republic of Korea.
Hyun-Chul KimDepartment of Bioanalysis, Seoul Medical Science Institute & Seoul Clinical Laboratories, Seoul 152-766, Republic of Korea.
Hyogyeong KimDepartment of Bioanalysis, Seoul Medical Science Institute & Seoul Clinical Laboratories, Seoul 152-766, Republic of Korea.
Hyung Joo KimDepartment of Biological Engineering, College of Engineering, Konkuk University, Seoul 143-701, Republic of Korea.
Yun-Tae KimDepartment of Bioanalysis, Seoul Medical Science Institute & Seoul Clinical Laboratories, Seoul 152-766, Republic of Korea.
Kyoung-Ryul LeeDepartment of Bioanalysis, Seoul Medical Science Institute & Seoul Clinical Laboratories, Seoul 152-766, Republic of Korea.
Young-Jin KimDepartment of Bioanalysis, Seoul Medical Science Institute & Seoul Clinical Laboratories, Seoul 152-766, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-9980-8143

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A fast, sensitive, and selective liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method was validated and then the levels of cortisol and cortisone from sera of healthy adults were determined by the LC-MS/MS method. One hundred μ L of serum sample was directly extracted by adding 2 mL ethyl acetate, followed by chromatographic separation on a C18 column with a mobile phase consisting of 5 mM ammonium acetate and methanol (25 : 75, v/v). The precision, accuracy, and average recovery of the method were 1.5-5.3%, 95.4-102.5%, and 96.4% for cortisol, and 1.9-6.0%, 89.2-98.8%, and 79.9% for cortisone, respectively. The method was linear from 1.0 to 500.0 ng/mL (r(2) = 0.999) for cortisol and 2.5 to 100.0 ng/mL (r(2) = 0.998) for cortisone. The limits of detection (LOD) and quantification (LOQ) were 0.2 and 1.0 ng/mL for cortisol, and 1.0 and 2.5 ng/mL for cortisone, respectively. The average cortisol concentration (133.9 ± 63.7 ng/mL) of samples collected between 9:00 and 11:00 a.m. was higher approximately 4.4 times than that of cortisone (30.5 ± 10.7 ng/mL) (P < 0.0001). The average cortisone/cortisol ratio was 0.225. Therefore, the LC-MS/MS method may be useful for the diagnosis of some adrenal diseases and the assessment of 11 β -hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (11 β -HSD) activity in clinical laboratories.

Identifiers

PMID24729916
PMCPMC3963115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.