Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24729825›Full record

ArticleCurrent cardiovascular risk reports2014

Self-Reported Experiences of Discrimination and Cardiovascular Disease.

Tené T Lewis, David R Williams, Mahader Tamene, Cheryl R Clark

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current cardiovascular risk reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 109 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
109citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

109 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Perceived Discrimination in Medical Care Settings on A1c Data From theHealth education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

49 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tené T LewisDepartment of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
David R WilliamsDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA.
Mahader TameneDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA.
Cheryl R ClarkCenter for Community Health and Health Equity, Division of General Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's-Faulkner Hospitalist Program, Boston, MA.

Funding

Everyday Discrimination and Cardiovascular Disease in African-American WomenK01HL092591 · NHLBI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI LEWIS, TENÉ T · 2008 to 2012
$749k
NHLBI NIH HHS K01 HL092591
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Researchers have long speculated that exposure to discrimination may increase cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk but compared to other psychosocial risk factors, large-scale epidemiologic and community based studies examining associations between reports of discrimination and CVD risk have only emerged fairly recently. This review summarizes findings from studies of self-reported experiences of discrimination and CVD risk published between 2011-2013. We document the innovative advances in recent work, the notable heterogeneity in these studies, and the considerable need for additional work with objective clinical endpoints other than blood pressure. Implications for the study of racial disparities in CVD and clinical practice are also discussed.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular diseaseDiscriminationEthnicRacial

Identifiers

PMID24729825
PMCPMC3980947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.