ArticleRadiation protection dosimetry2014
Advances in a framework to compare bio-dosimetry methods for triage in large-scale radiation events.
Article in Radiation protection dosimetry, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Benefits and challenges of in vivo EPR nail biodosimetry in a second tier of medical triage in response to a large radiation event.Radiation protection dosimetry · 2023Review
- Proteomics and secreted lipidomics of mouse-derived bone marrow cells exposed to a lethal level of ionizing radiation.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Cross-platform validation of a mouse blood gene signature for quantitative reconstruction of radiation dose.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Dose and Dose-Rate Effects in a Mouse Model of Internal Exposure to 137Cs. Part 1: Global Transcriptomic Responses in Blood.Radiation research · 2020Article
- Review
- New Approaches for Quantitative Reconstruction of Radiation Dose in Human Blood Cells.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- RABiT-II-DCA: A Fully-automated Dicentric Chromosome Assay in Multiwell Plates.Radiation research · 2019Article
- Candidate protein markers for radiation biodosimetry in the hematopoietically humanized mouse model.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Development of a novel mouth model as an alternative tool to test the effectiveness of an in vivo EPR dosimetry system.Physics in medicine and biology · 2018Article
- Developments in Biodosimetry Methods for Triage With a Focus on X-band Electron Paramagnetic Resonance In Vivo Fingernail Dosimetry.Health physics · 2018Article
- Serum miR-375-3p increase in mice exposed to a high dose of ionizing radiation.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- The Application and Distribution of Magnetic Field Modulation in the Detection Apertures of X-band EPR Cavities for In Vivo Tooth Dosimetry.Radiation protection dosimetry · 2016Article
- Using Stable Free Radicals to Obtain Unique and Clinically Useful Data In Vivo in Human Subjects.Radiation protection dosimetry · 2016Review
- IN-VIVO RADIATION DOSIMETRY USING PORTABLE L BAND EPR: ON-SITE MEASUREMENT OF VOLUNTEERS IN FUKUSHIMA PREFECTURE, JAPAN.Radiation protection dosimetry · 2016Article
- FLEXIBLE, WIRELESS, INDUCTIVELY COUPLED SURFACE COIL RESONATOR FOR EPR TOOTH DOSIMETRY.Radiation protection dosimetry · 2016Article
- Advances in in vivo EPR Tooth BIOdosimetry: Meeting the targets for initial triage following a large-scale radiation event.Radiation protection dosimetry · 2016Review
- Evaluating the Special Needs of The Military for Radiation Biodosimetry for Tactical Warfare Against Deployed Troops: Comparing Military to Civilian Needs for Biodosimetry Methods.Health physics · 2016Article
- Radiation dose-rate effects on gene expression for human biodosimetry.BMC medical genomics · 2015Article
- Imaging tooth enamel using zero echo time (ZTE) magnetic resonance imaging.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2015Article
- Proteomic Profiling for Serum Biomarkers in Mice Exposed to Ionizing Radiation.Dose-response : a publication of International Hormesis SocietyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Planning and preparation for a large-scale nuclear event would be advanced by assessing the applicability of potentially available bio-dosimetry methods. Using an updated comparative framework the performance of six bio-dosimetry methods was compared for five different population sizes (100-1,000,000) and two rates for initiating processing of the marker (15 or 15,000 people per hour) with four additional time windows. These updated factors are extrinsic to the bio-dosimetry methods themselves but have direct effects on each method's ability to begin processing individuals and the size of the population that can be accommodated. The results indicate that increased population size, along with severely compromised infrastructure, increases the time needed to triage, which decreases the usefulness of many time intensive dosimetry methods. This framework and model for evaluating bio-dosimetry provides important information for policy-makers and response planners to facilitate evaluation of each method and should advance coordination of these methods into effective triage plans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.