Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24729506›Full record

Observational studyClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2014

Xpert MTB/RIF assay shortens airborne isolation for hospitalized patients with presumptive tuberculosis in the United States.

Christopher K Lippincott, Melissa B Miller, Elena B Popowitch, Colleen F Hanrahan, Annelies Van Rie

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Utility ofJournal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis From Patients Who Are Nucleic Acid Amplification Test Negative.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Clinical Impact and Cost-effectiveness of Xpert MTB/RIF Testing in Hospitalized Patients With Presumptive Pulmonary Tuberculosis in the United States.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2017
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christopher K LippincottInstitute for Global Health and Infectious Diseases.
Melissa B MillerDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Elena B PopowitchClinical Microbiology/Immunology Laboratories, University of North Carolina Health Care, Chapel Hill.
Colleen F HanrahanDepartment of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Annelies Van RieDepartment of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of North Carolina Health Care · US

Funding

Training in Sexually Transmitted Infections and HIVT32AI007001 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI SENA-SOBERANO, ARLENE C. · 1985 to 2025
$10.9M
Fogarty Global Health Fellows Coordinating CenterR25TW009340 · FIC · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI CHI, BENJAMIN H. · 2012 to 2016
$6.9M
FIC NIH HHS R25 TW009340NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI007001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the United States, individuals with presumptive pulmonary tuberculosis are placed in airborne infection isolation (AII) and assessed by smear microscopy on 3 respiratory specimens collected 8-24 hours apart. Xpert MTB/RIF assay (Xpert) on 1, 2, or 3 specimens may be more efficient for determining AII discontinuation.

methodsThis single-center, observational cohort study of inpatients with presumptive pulmonary tuberculosis enrolled adults with 1 or more sputum specimens submitted for smear microscopy. Smear microscopy and Xpert were performed on each sputum specimen. Clinicians were blinded to Xpert results. The primary endpoint was AII duration. Secondary endpoints were laboratory processing time, strategy-based tuberculosis detection, and sensitivity and specificity.

resultsAmong 207 subjects, the median AII duration was 68.0 hours (interquartile range [IQR], 47.1-97.5) for smear microscopy compared with 20.8 hours (IQR, 16.8-32.0) for the 1-specimen Xpert, 41.2 hours (IQR, 26.6-54.8) for the 2-specimen Xpert, and 54.0 hours (IQR, 43.3-80.0) for the 3-specimen Xpert strategies (P ≤ .004). Median laboratory processing time for smear microscopy was 2.5 times as long as Xpert (P < .001). The 2- and 3-specimen Xpert and smear microscopy strategies captured all 6 tuberculosis cases. The 1-specimen Xpert strategy missed 1 case. No difference was observed between smear microscopy and Xpert in sensitivity or specificity for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

conclusionsXpert-based strategies significantly reduced AII duration compared with the smear-based strategy. The 2-specimen Xpert strategy was most efficient in minimizing AII time while identifying all tuberculosis cases among individuals with presumptive tuberculosis in this low-burden setting.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBacteriological TechniquesCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMicroscopyMiddle AgedMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesMycobacterium tuberculosisPatient IsolationSensitivity and SpecificitySputuminfection controltuberculosisUnited StatesXpert

Identifiers

PMID24729506
PMCPMC4133562
OpenAlexW2151032921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.