ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2014
The movement of a nerve in a magnetic field: application to MRI Lorentz effect imaging.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Homogenized multiscale modelling of an electrically active double poroelastic material representing the myocardium.Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology · 2025Article
- Gradient Rotating Magnetic Fields Impairing F-Actin-Related Gene CCDC150 to Inhibit Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Metastasis by Inactivating TGF-β1/SMAD3 Signaling Pathway.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2024Article
- Can MRI Be Used as a Sensor to Record Neural Activity?Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Magneto-acoustic imaging by continuous-wave excitation.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2017Article
- Biomechanics of cell membrane under low-frequency time-varying magnetic field: a shell model.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2016Article
- Direct neural current imaging in an intact cerebellum with magnetic resonance imaging.NeuroImage · 2016Article
- Vesicle biomechanics in a time-varying magnetic field.BMC biophysics · 2015Article
- Magnetic fields from skeletal muscles: a valuable physiological measurement?Frontiers in physiology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Direct detection of neural activity with MRI would be a breakthrough innovation in brain imaging. A Lorentz force method has been proposed to image nerve activity using MRI; a force between the action currents and the static MRI magnetic field causes the nerve to move. In the presence of a magnetic field gradient, this will cause the spins to precess at a different frequency, affecting the MRI signal. Previous mathematical modeling suggests that this effect is too small to explain the experimental data, but that model was limited because the action currents were assumed to be independent of position along the nerve and because the magnetic field was assumed to be perpendicular to the nerve. In this paper, we calculate the nerve displacement analytically without these two assumptions. Using realistic parameter values, the nerve motion is <5 nm, which induced a phase shift in the MRI signal of <0.02°. Therefore, our results suggest that Lorentz force imaging is beyond the capabilities of current technology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.