Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24728653›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2014

Decision-making impairment predicts 3-month hair-indexed cocaine relapse.

Antonio Verdejo-Garcia, Natalia Albein-Urios, Jose Miguel Martinez-Gonzalez, Ester Civit, Rafael de la Torre, Oscar Lozano

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Cognition and addiction
.Dialogues in clinical neuroscience · 2019
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Antonio Verdejo-GarciaRed de Trastornos Adictivos, Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain, antonio.verdejo@monash.edu.
Natalia Albein-Urios
Jose Miguel Martinez-Gonzalez
Ester Civit
Rafael de la Torre
Oscar Lozano
Universidad de Granada · ESCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red · ESHospital Del Mar · ESMonash University · AUUniversidad de Huelva · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleOne of the key outstanding challenges in cocaine dependence research is determining who is at risk of relapsing during treatment.

objectivesWe examined whether cognitive decision-making profiles predict objectively (hair) indexed cocaine relapse at 3-month follow-up.

methodsThirty-three cocaine-dependent patients commencing outpatient treatment in a public clinic performed baseline decision-making assessments with the original and variant versions of the Iowa Gambling Task, and provided a 3-cm hair sample 3 months afterwards. Based on Iowa Gambling Tasks' performance cut-offs, 5 patients had intact decision-making skills, 17 patients showed impaired sensitivity to reward or punishment (impairment in one of the tasks), and 9 patients showed insensitivity to future consequences (impairment in both tasks). Based on a 0.3 ng/mg cocaine cut-off, 23 patients were classified as relapsers and 10 as non-relapsers at the 3-month follow-up.

resultsEighty percent of patients with intact decision-making were abstinent at follow-up, whereas 90% of patients with insensitivity to future consequences had relapsed. The two subgroups (relapsers and non-relapsers) showed no significant differences on drug use, comorbidities, or psychosocial function, and significantly differed on verbal but not performance IQ. A regression model including decision-making scores and verbal IQ predicted abstinence status with high sensitivity (95%) and moderately high specificity (81%).

conclusionThese preliminary findings demonstrate that decision-making profiles are associated with cocaine relapse. Moreover, combined decision-making and IQ assessments provide optimal predictive values over stimulant relapse, yielding significant opportunities for clinical translation.

Indexed as

CognitionDecision MakingAdultCocaineCocaine-Related DisordersFemaleGamblingHairHumansIntelligence TestsMaleNeuropsychological TestsPunishmentRecurrenceRewardSensitivity and SpecificityCocaine

Identifiers

PMID24728653
OpenAlexW2018838961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.