Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24728280›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Dissecting a hidden gene duplication: the Arabidopsis thaliana SEC10 locus.

Nemanja Vukašinović, Fatima Cvrčková, Marek Eliáš, Rex Cole, John E Fowler, Viktor Žárský, Lukáš Synek

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Functional Specialization within the EXO70 Gene Family in Arabidopsis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Integrating Molecular Biology and Bioinformatics Education.Journal of integrative bioinformatics · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. CSI1, PATROL1, and exocyst complex cooperate in delivery of cellulose synthase complexes to the plasma membrane.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Nemanja VukašinovićInstitute of Experimental Botany, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Experimental Plant Biology, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Fatima CvrčkováDepartment of Experimental Plant Biology, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Marek EliášDepartment of Botany, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Science, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Rex ColeDepartment of Botany and Plant Pathology and Center for Genome Research and Biocomputing, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, United States of America.
John E FowlerDepartment of Botany and Plant Pathology and Center for Genome Research and Biocomputing, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, United States of America.
Viktor ŽárskýInstitute of Experimental Botany, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Experimental Plant Biology, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Lukáš SynekInstitute of Experimental Botany, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic.
Charles University · CZCzech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Experimental Botany · CZOregon State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Repetitive sequences present a challenge for genome sequence assembly, and highly similar segmental duplications may disappear from assembled genome sequences. Having found a surprising lack of observable phenotypic deviations and non-Mendelian segregation in Arabidopsis thaliana mutants in SEC10, a gene encoding a core subunit of the exocyst tethering complex, we examined whether this could be explained by a hidden gene duplication. Re-sequencing and manual assembly of the Arabidopsis thaliana SEC10 (At5g12370) locus revealed that this locus, comprising a single gene in the reference genome assembly, indeed contains two paralogous genes in tandem, SEC10a and SEC10b, and that a sequence segment of 7 kb in length is missing from the reference genome sequence. Differences between the two paralogs are concentrated in non-coding regions, while the predicted protein sequences exhibit 99% identity, differing only by substitution of five amino acid residues and an indel of four residues. Both SEC10 genes are expressed, although varying transcript levels suggest differential regulation. Homozygous T-DNA insertion mutants in either paralog exhibit a wild-type phenotype, consistent with proposed extensive functional redundancy of the two genes. By these observations we demonstrate that recently duplicated genes may remain hidden even in well-characterized genomes, such as that of A. thaliana. Moreover, we show that the use of the existing A. thaliana reference genome sequence as a guide for sequence assembly of new Arabidopsis accessions or related species has at least in some cases led to error propagation.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsDNA, BacterialGene DuplicationMutagenesis, InsertionalArabidopsis ProteinsDNA, BacterialT-DNA

Identifiers

PMID24728280
PMCPMC3984084
OpenAlexW2005340772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.