Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24728078›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Increased STAT1 signaling in endocrine-resistant breast cancer.

Rui Huang, Dana Faratian, Andrew H Sims, Danielle Wilson, Jeremy S Thomas, David J Harrison, Simon P Langdon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Rui HuangInstitute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom.
Dana FaratianInstitute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom.
Andrew H SimsInstitute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom.
Danielle WilsonInstitute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom.
Jeremy S ThomasDepartment of Pathology, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom.
David J HarrisonPathology, Medical and Biological Sciences Building, University of St Andrews, North Haugh, St. Andrews, Fife, Scotland, United Kingdom.
Simon P LangdonInstitute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom.
University of Edinburgh · GBMRC Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine · GBUniversity of St Andrews · GBWestern General Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proteomic profiling of the estrogen/tamoxifen-sensitive MCF-7 cell line and its partially sensitive (MCF-7/LCC1) and fully resistant (MCF-7/LCC9) variants was performed to identify modifiers of endocrine sensitivity in breast cancer. Analysis of the expression of 120 paired phosphorylated and non-phosphorylated epitopes in key oncogenic and tumor suppressor pathways revealed that STAT1 and several phosphorylated epitopes (phospho-STAT1(Tyr701) and phospho-STAT3(Ser727)) were differentially expressed between endocrine resistant and parental controls, confirmed by qRT-PCR and western blotting. The STAT1 inhibitor EGCG was a more effective inhibitor of the endocrine resistant MCF-7/LCC1 and MCF-7/LCC9 lines than parental MCF-7 cells, while STAT3 inhibitors Stattic and WP1066 were equally effective in endocrine-resistant and parental lines. The effects of the STAT inhibitors were additive, rather than synergistic, when tested in combination with tamoxifen in vitro. Expression of STAT1 and STAT3 were measured by quantitative immunofluorescence in invasive breast cancers and matched lymph nodes. When lymph node expression was compared to its paired primary breast cancer expression, there was greater expression of cytoplasmic STAT1 (∼3.1 fold), phospho-STAT3(Ser727) (∼1.8 fold), and STAT5 (∼1.5 fold) and nuclear phospho-STAT3(Ser727) (∼1.5 fold) in the nodes. Expression levels of STAT1 and STAT3 transcript were analysed in 550 breast cancers from publicly available gene expression datasets (GSE2990, GSE12093, GSE6532). When treatment with tamoxifen was considered, STAT1 gene expression was nearly predictive of distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS, log-rank p = 0.067), while STAT3 gene expression was predictive of DMFS (log-rank p<0.0001). Analysis of STAT1 and STAT3 protein expression in a series of 546 breast cancers also indicated that high expression of STAT3 protein was associated with improved survival (DMFS, p = 0.006). These results suggest that STAT signaling is important in endocrine resistance, and that STAT inhibitors may represent potential therapies in breast cancer, even in the resistant setting.

Indexed as

Blotting, WesternBreast NeoplasmsCatechinCell SurvivalCyclic S-OxidesEstrogensFemaleHumansMCF-7 CellsPolymerase Chain ReactionPyridinesSTAT1 Transcription FactorSTAT3 Transcription FactorTamoxifenTyrphostinsCatechinCyclic S-Oxidesepigallocatechin gallateEstrogensPyridinesSTAT1 Transcription FactorSTAT3 Transcription FactorstatticTamoxifenTyrphostinsWP1066

Identifiers

PMID24728078
PMCPMC3984130
OpenAlexW2055861869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.