Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24727996›Full record

ArticleBlood cancer journal2014

The evolution of clinical trials for infant acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

R S Kotecha, N G Gottardo, U R Kees, C H Cole

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Blood cancer journal, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. FDA-approved disulfiram as a novel treatment for aggressive leukemia.Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  4. Infant Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia-New Therapeutic Opportunities.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Updates in infant acute lymphoblastic leukemia and the potential for targeted therapy.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Therapeutic Targeting of the Leukaemia Microenvironment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. SystematicFrontiers in oncology · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

R S Kotecha1] Department of Haematology and Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital for Children, Perth, Western Australia, Australia [2] Telethon Institute for Child Health Research, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia [3] School of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
N G Gottardo1] Department of Haematology and Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital for Children, Perth, Western Australia, Australia [2] Telethon Institute for Child Health Research, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia [3] School of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
U R KeesTelethon Institute for Child Health Research, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
C H Cole1] Department of Haematology and Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital for Children, Perth, Western Australia, Australia [2] Telethon Institute for Child Health Research, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia [3] School of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Princess Margaret Hospital for Children · AUThe Kids Research Institute Australia · AUUniversity of Western Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in infants has a significantly inferior outcome in comparison with older children. Despite initial improvements in survival of infants with ALL since establishment of the first pediatric cooperative group ALL trials, the poor outcome has plateaued in recent years. Historically, infants were treated on risk-adapted childhood ALL protocols. These studies were pivotal in identifying the need for infant-specific protocols, delineating prognostic categories and the requirement for a more unified approach between study groups to overcome limitations in accrual because of low incidence. This subsequently led to the development of collaborative infant-specific studies. Landmark outcomes have included the elimination of cranial radiotherapy following the discovery of intrathecal and high-dose systemic therapy as a superior and effective treatment strategy for central nervous system disease prophylaxis, with improved neurodevelopmental outcome. Universal prospective identification of independent adverse prognostic factors, including presence of a mixed lineage leukemia rearrangement and young age, has established the basis for risk stratification within current trials. The infant-specific trials have defined limits to which conventional chemotherapeutic agents can be intensified to optimize the balance between treatment efficacy and toxicity. Despite variations in therapeutic intensity, there has been no recent improvement in survival due to the equilibrium between relapse and toxicity. Ultimately, to improve the outcome for infants with ALL, key areas still to be addressed include identification and adaptation of novel prognostic markers and innovative therapies, establishing the role of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in first complete remission, treatment strategies for relapsed/refractory disease and monitoring and timely intervention of late effects in survivors. This would be best achieved through a single unified international trial.

Identifiers

PMID24727996
PMCPMC4003413
OpenAlexW2055940669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.