ArticleBlood cancer journal2014
The evolution of clinical trials for infant acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
Article in Blood cancer journal, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.
- Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Infant Leukemia: A Single-Center Case Series and Narrative Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Review
- FDA-approved disulfiram as a novel treatment for aggressive leukemia.Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany) · 2024Article
- Infant Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia-New Therapeutic Opportunities.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Late effects in survivors of infant acute lymphoblastic leukaemia-a study of the Australian and New Zealand Children's Haematology/Oncology Group.Blood cancer journal · 2023Article
- Updates in infant acute lymphoblastic leukemia and the potential for targeted therapy.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2022Article
- Gasotransmitters in the tumor microenvironment: Impacts on cancer chemotherapy (Review).Molecular medicine reports · 2022Review
- Review
- Exploiting the reactive oxygen species imbalance in high-risk paediatric acute lymphoblastic leukaemia through auranofin.British journal of cancer · 2021Article
- Therapeutic Targeting of the Leukaemia Microenvironment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Irinotecan Induces Disease Remission in Xenograft Mouse Models of PediatricBiomedicines · 2021Article
- SystematicFrontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- Preclinical Evaluation of Carfilzomib for InfantFrontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- Effective targeting of NAMPT in patient-derived xenograft models of high-risk pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia.Leukemia · 2020Article
- The Population Pharmacokinetics of High-Dose Methotrexate in Infants with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Highlight the Need for Bedside Individualized Dose Adjustment: A Report from the Children's Oncology Group.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2019Article
- Romidepsin enhances the efficacy of cytarabineHaematologica · 2019Article
- Targeting the bone marrow microenvironment: a novel therapeutic strategy for pre-B acute lymphoblastic leukemia.Oncotarget · 2019Article
- New therapeutic opportunities from dissecting the pre-B leukemia bone marrow microenvironment.Leukemia · 2018Article
- Systematic chemical and molecular profiling of MLL-rearranged infant acute lymphoblastic leukemia reveals efficacy of romidepsin.Leukemia · 2017Article
- CCI-007, a novel small molecule with cytotoxic activity against infant leukemia with MLL rearrangements.Oncotarget · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in infants has a significantly inferior outcome in comparison with older children. Despite initial improvements in survival of infants with ALL since establishment of the first pediatric cooperative group ALL trials, the poor outcome has plateaued in recent years. Historically, infants were treated on risk-adapted childhood ALL protocols. These studies were pivotal in identifying the need for infant-specific protocols, delineating prognostic categories and the requirement for a more unified approach between study groups to overcome limitations in accrual because of low incidence. This subsequently led to the development of collaborative infant-specific studies. Landmark outcomes have included the elimination of cranial radiotherapy following the discovery of intrathecal and high-dose systemic therapy as a superior and effective treatment strategy for central nervous system disease prophylaxis, with improved neurodevelopmental outcome. Universal prospective identification of independent adverse prognostic factors, including presence of a mixed lineage leukemia rearrangement and young age, has established the basis for risk stratification within current trials. The infant-specific trials have defined limits to which conventional chemotherapeutic agents can be intensified to optimize the balance between treatment efficacy and toxicity. Despite variations in therapeutic intensity, there has been no recent improvement in survival due to the equilibrium between relapse and toxicity. Ultimately, to improve the outcome for infants with ALL, key areas still to be addressed include identification and adaptation of novel prognostic markers and innovative therapies, establishing the role of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in first complete remission, treatment strategies for relapsed/refractory disease and monitoring and timely intervention of late effects in survivors. This would be best achieved through a single unified international trial.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.