Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24727653›Full record

ArticleNature methods2014

Rapid adaptive optical recovery of optimal resolution over large volumes.

Kai Wang, Daniel E Milkie, Ankur Saxena, Peter Engerer, Thomas Misgeld, Marianne E Bronner, Jeff Mumm, Eric Betzig

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature methods, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 121 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
121citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

121 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Machine learning assisted wavefront sensor.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. A Multimodal Adaptive Optical Microscope ForbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

61 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kai WangJanelia Farm Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, Virginia, USA.
Daniel E MilkieColeman Technologies, Inc., Newtown Square, Pennsylvania, USA.
Ankur SaxenaDivision of Biology, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA.
Peter EngererInstitute of Neuronal Cell Biology, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Thomas Misgeld1] Institute of Neuronal Cell Biology, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany. [2] Munich Center for Systems Neurology, Munich, Germany. [3] German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Munich, Germany.
Marianne E BronnerDivision of Biology, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA.
Jeff Mumm1] Department of Cellular Biology and Anatomy, Georgia Regents University, Augusta, Georgia, USA. [2].
Eric Betzig1] Janelia Farm Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, Virginia, USA. [2].

Funding

Ectodermal Placode Development into Sensory StructuresR01DE016459 · NIDCR · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI BRONNER, MARIANNE · 2004 to 2014
$3.8M
New Transgenic Tools for Studying Neural Circuit FormationR21MH083614 · NIMH · AUGUSTA UNIVERSITY · PI MUMM, JEFFREY · 2008 to 2009
$404k
Robotic whole organism HTS platform for drug discovery and developmentR41TR000945 · NCATS · LUMINOMICS, INC. · PI MUMM, JEFFREY · 2014 to 2014
$225k
Targeted Cellular Ablation in Transgenic ZebrafishR43HD047089 · NICHD · LUMINOMICS, INC. · PI MUMM, JEFFREY S. · 2004 to 2004
$107k
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNCATS NIH HHS R41 TR000945NICHD NIH HHS R43 HD047089NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE016459NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH083614
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Using a descanned, laser-induced guide star and direct wavefront sensing, we demonstrate adaptive correction of complex optical aberrations at high numerical aperture (NA) and a 14-ms update rate. This correction permits us to compensate for the rapid spatial variation in aberration often encountered in biological specimens and to recover diffraction-limited imaging over large volumes (>240 mm per side). We applied this to image fine neuronal processes and subcellular dynamics within the zebrafish brain.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell LineMicroscopy, ConfocalOptics and PhotonicsTime FactorsZebrafish

Identifiers

PMID24727653
PMCPMC4069208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.