Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24727460›Full record

ReviewJournal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection2014

Mitigating the risk of radiation-induced cancers: limitations and paradigms in drug development.

Stephen S Yoo, Timothy J Jorgensen, Ann R Kennedy, John D Boice, Alla Shapiro, Tom C-C Hu, Brian R Moyer, Marcy B Grace, Gary J Kelloff, Michael Fenech and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
37.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 222 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Ionizing radiation exposure: hazards, prevention, and biomarker screening.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2018
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Stephen S YooRadiation Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Timothy J Jorgensen
Ann R Kennedy
John D Boice
Alla Shapiro
Tom C-C Hu
Brian R Moyer
Marcy B Grace
Gary J Kelloff
Michael Fenech
Pataje G S Prasanna
C Norman Coleman
Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority · USNational Cancer Institute · USNational Institutes of Health · USCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research · USGeorgetown University · USHealth Sciences and Nutrition · AUUniversity of Pennsylvania · USVanderbilt University · US

Funding

Molecular-Targeted Radiation TherapyZ01BC010670 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI COLEMAN, C NORMAN · 2005 to 2008
$1.4M
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 BC010670Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The United States radiation medical countermeasures (MCM) programme for radiological and nuclear incidents has been focusing on developing mitigators for the acute radiation syndrome (ARS) and delayed effects of acute radiation exposure (DEARE), and biodosimetry technologies to provide radiation dose assessments for guiding treatment. Because a nuclear accident or terrorist incident could potentially expose a large number of people to low to moderate doses of ionising radiation, and thus increase their excess lifetime cancer risk, there is an interest in developing mitigators for this purpose. This article discusses the current status, issues, and challenges regarding development of mitigators against radiation-induced cancers. The challenges of developing mitigators for ARS include: the long latency between exposure and cancer manifestation, limitations of animal models, potential side effects of the mitigator itself, potential need for long-term use, the complexity of human trials to demonstrate effectiveness, and statistical power constraints for measuring health risks (and reduction of health risks after mitigation) following relatively low radiation doses (<0.75 Gy). Nevertheless, progress in the understanding of the molecular mechanisms resulting in radiation injury, along with parallel progress in dose assessment technologies, make this an opportune, if not critical, time to invest in research strategies that result in the development of agents to lower the risk of radiation-induced cancers for populations that survive a significant radiation exposure incident.

Indexed as

Drug DesignRadioactive Hazard ReleaseHumansNeoplasms, Radiation-InducedRadiation DosageRadiation ProtectionRadiation-Protective AgentsRadiometryRisk AssessmentRadiation-Protective Agents

Identifiers

PMID24727460
PMCPMC7668684
OpenAlexW2010962051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.