Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24727327›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2014

Small-molecule RA-9 inhibits proteasome-associated DUBs and ovarian cancer in vitro and in vivo via exacerbating unfolded protein responses.

Kathleen Coughlin, Ravi Anchoori, Yoshie Iizuka, Joyce Meints, Lauren MacNeill, Rachel Isaksson Vogel, Robert Z Orlowski, Michael K Lee, Richard B S Roden, Martina Bazzaro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. The Ubiquitin-Proteasome System in Brain Disorders: Pathogenic Pathways, Post-Translational Tweaks, and Therapeutic Frontiers.Journal of neuroimmune pharmacology : the official journal of the Society on NeuroImmune Pharmacology · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kathleen CoughlinAuthors' Affiliations: Masonic Cancer Center and Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Heath, Department of Neurosciences, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, Minneapolis, Minnesota; Departments of Pathology, Oncology, and Gynecology and Obstetrics, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland; and Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Ravi AnchooriAuthors' Affiliations: Masonic Cancer Center and Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Heath, Department of Neurosciences, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, Minneapolis, Minnesota; Departments of Pathology, Oncology, and Gynecology and Obstetrics, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland; and Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TexasAuthors' Affiliations: Masonic Cancer Center and Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Heath, Department of Neurosciences, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, Minneapolis, Minnesota; Departments of Pathology, Oncology, and Gynecology and Obstetrics, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland; and Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Yoshie IizukaAuthors' Affiliations: Masonic Cancer Center and Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Heath, Department of Neurosciences, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, Minneapolis, Minnesota; Departments of Pathology, Oncology, and Gynecology and Obstetrics, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland; and Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Joyce MeintsAuthors' Affiliations: Masonic Cancer Center and Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Heath, Department of Neurosciences, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, Minneapolis, Minnesota; Departments of Pathology, Oncology, and Gynecology and Obstetrics, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland; and Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Lauren MacNeillAuthors' Affiliations: Masonic Cancer Center and Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Heath, Department of Neurosciences, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, Minneapolis, Minnesota; Departments of Pathology, Oncology, and Gynecology and Obstetrics, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland; and Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Rachel Isaksson VogelAuthors' Affiliations: Masonic Cancer Center and Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Heath, Department of Neurosciences, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, Minneapolis, Minnesota; Departments of Pathology, Oncology, and Gynecology and Obstetrics, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland; and Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Robert Z OrlowskiAuthors' Affiliations: Masonic Cancer Center and Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Heath, Department of Neurosciences, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, Minneapolis, Minnesota; Departments of Pathology, Oncology, and Gynecology and Obstetrics, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland; and Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Michael K LeeAuthors' Affiliations: Masonic Cancer Center and Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Heath, Department of Neurosciences, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, Minneapolis, Minnesota; Departments of Pathology, Oncology, and Gynecology and Obstetrics, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland; and Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Richard B S RodenAuthors' Affiliations: Masonic Cancer Center and Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Heath, Department of Neurosciences, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, Minneapolis, Minnesota; Departments of Pathology, Oncology, and Gynecology and Obstetrics, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland; and Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TexasAuthors' Affiliations: Masonic Cancer Center and Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Heath, Department of Neurosciences, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, Minneapolis, Minnesota; Departments of Pathology, Oncology, and Gynecology and Obstetrics, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland; and Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TexasAuthors' Affiliations: Masonic Cancer Center and Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Heath, Department of Neurosciences, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, Minneapolis, Minnesota; Departments of Pathology, Oncology, and Gynecology and Obstetrics, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland; and Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Martina BazzaroAuthors' Affiliations: Masonic Cancer Center and Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Heath, Department of Neurosciences, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, Minneapolis, Minnesota; Departments of Pathology, Oncology, and Gynecology and Obstetrics, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland; and Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas mbazzaro@umn.edu.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USJohns Hopkins University · USJohns Hopkins Medicine · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
SWOG - Foreign Accrual under UMiU10CA032102 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BLANKE, CHARLES D. · 1985 to 2013
$141.3M
Women's CancerP30CA077598 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI Douglas Yee · 1998 to 2026
$100.4M
Treatment of HIV- and HIV+ Patients with HPV16+ CIN2/3 Using pNGLV4a-hCRTE6E7L2 DNA vaccine administered intramuscularly via electroporationP50CA098252 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Richard Bruce Roden · 2003 to 2026
$53.5M
University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UMN CTSI)UL1TR000114 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BLAZAR, BRUCE R · 2012 to 2015
$35.0M
P4 -TARGETING MULTIPLE MYELOMA BY COMBINING CDK INHIBITORS AND BCL-2 ANTAGONISTSP50CA142509 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI KWAK, LARRY W · 2010 to 2014
$11.1M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000114NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS P30 CA077598NCI NIH HHS P50 CA098252NCI NIH HHS P50 CA142509NCI NIH HHS U10 CA032102
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeOvarian cancer is the deadliest of the gynecologic malignancies. Carcinogenic progression is accompanied by upregulation of ubiquitin-dependent protein degradation machinery as a mechanism to compensate with elevated endogenous proteotoxic stress. Recent studies support the notion that deubiquitinating enzymes (DUB) are essential factors in proteolytic degradation and that their aberrant activity is linked to cancer progression and chemoresistance. Thus, DUBs are an attractive therapeutic target for ovarian cancer. EXPERIMENTAL

designThe potency and selectivity of RA-9 inhibitor for proteasome-associated DUBs was determined in ovarian cancer cell lines and primary cells. The anticancer activity of RA-9 and its mechanism of action were evaluated in multiple cancer cell lines in vitro and in vivo in immunodeficient mice bearing an intraperitoneal ES-2 xenograft model of human ovarian cancer.

resultsHere, we report the characterization of RA-9 as a small-molecule inhibitor of proteasome-associated DUBs. Treatment with RA-9 selectively induces onset of apoptosis in ovarian cancer cell lines and primary cultures derived from donors. Loss of cell viability following RA-9 exposure is associated with an unfolded protein response as mechanism to compensate for unsustainable levels of proteotoxic stress. In vivo treatment with RA-9 retards tumor growth, increases overall survival, and was well tolerated by the host.

conclusionsOur preclinical studies support further evaluation of RA-9 as an ovarian cancer therapeutic.

Indexed as

AnimalsApoptosisBenzylidene CompoundsBlotting, WesternCell CycleCell ProliferationFemaleFlow CytometryHumansImmunoenzyme TechniquesIn Vitro TechniquesMiceMice, NudeOvarian NeoplasmsPiperidonesProteasome Endopeptidase Complex3,5-bis(nitrobenzylidene)piperidin-4-oneBenzylidene CompoundsPiperidonesProteasome Endopeptidase ComplexProteasome InhibitorsSmall Molecule LibrariesUbiquitinUbiquitin-Specific Proteases

Identifiers

PMID24727327
PMCPMC4269153
OpenAlexW1966182875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.