Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24727143›Full record

ArticleJournal of immunological methods2014

Setting objective thresholds for rare event detection in flow cytometry.

Adam J Richards, Janet Staats, Jennifer Enzor, Katherine McKinnon, Jacob Frelinger, Thomas N Denny, Kent J Weinhold, Cliburn Chan

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of immunological methods, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guidelines for Gating Flow Cytometry Data for Immunological Assays.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2027
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Adam J RichardsDepartment of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Duke Center for AIDS Research, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Duke External Quality Assurance Program Oversight Laboratory, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA. Electronic address: adam.richards@ecoex-moulis.cnrs.fr.
Janet StaatsDuke Center for AIDS Research, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Duke External Quality Assurance Program Oversight Laboratory, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Jennifer EnzorDuke Center for AIDS Research, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Duke External Quality Assurance Program Oversight Laboratory, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Katherine McKinnonVaccine Branch, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Jacob FrelingerInstitute for Genome Sciences and Policy, Duke University, NC, USA.
Thomas N DennyDuke External Quality Assurance Program Oversight Laboratory, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Duke Human Vaccine Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Kent J WeinholdDuke Center for AIDS Research, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Duke External Quality Assurance Program Oversight Laboratory, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Cliburn ChanDepartment of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Duke Center for AIDS Research, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Duke External Quality Assurance Program Oversight Laboratory, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Duke University · USDuke Medical Center · USCenter for Cancer Research · US

Funding

Social and Behavioral Sciences CoreP30AI064518 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Nwora Lance Okeke · 2005 to 2026
$50.5M
CCR VB FACS COREZICBC010936 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI MCKINNON, KATHERINE · 2009 to 2025
$10.9M
Computational Biology and Bioinformatics Training ProgramT32GM071340 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MAGWENE, PAUL MITAARI · 2005 to 2020
$3.3M
Engineering Morphogenetic Factors for Enhanced Genetic ReprogrammingDP2OD008586 · OD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI GERSBACH, CHARLES A. · 2011 to 2011
$2.4M
Immune profiling of multi-parameter flow cytometry using computational statisticsRC1AI086032 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI CHAN, CLIBURN C · 2009 to 2010
$977k
IMMUNOLOGY QUALITY ASSURANCE-266995356N01AI095356 · NIAID · UNIV OF MED/DENT OF NJ-NJ MEDICAL SCHOOL · 1999 to 2003
–
NIAID NIH HHS 5P30-AI064518-05NIAID NIH HHS HHSN272201000045CNIAID NIH HHS N01 AI095356NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI064518NIAID NIH HHS RC1 AI086032NIAID NIH HHS RC1AI086032-01NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM071340NIH HHS DP2 OD008586
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The accurate identification of rare antigen-specific cytokine positive cells from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) after antigenic stimulation in an intracellular staining (ICS) flow cytometry assay is challenging, as cytokine positive events may be fairly diffusely distributed and lack an obvious separation from the negative population. Traditionally, the approach by flow operators has been to manually set a positivity threshold to partition events into cytokine-positive and cytokine-negative. This approach suffers from subjectivity and inconsistency across different flow operators. The use of statistical clustering methods does not remove the need to find an objective threshold between between positive and negative events since consistent identification of rare event subsets is highly challenging for automated algorithms, especially when there is distributional overlap between the positive and negative events ("smear"). We present a new approach, based on the Fβ measure, that is similar to manual thresholding in providing a hard cutoff, but has the advantage of being determined objectively. The performance of this algorithm is compared with results obtained by expert visual gating. Several ICS data sets from the External Quality Assurance Program Oversight Laboratory (EQAPOL) proficiency program were used to make the comparisons. We first show that visually determined thresholds are difficult to reproduce and pose a problem when comparing results across operators or laboratories, as well as problems that occur with the use of commonly employed clustering algorithms. In contrast, a single parameterization for the Fβ method performs consistently across different centers, samples, and instruments because it optimizes the precision/recall tradeoff by using both negative and positive controls.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAutomation, LaboratoryBiomarkersCytokinesFlow CytometryGuideline AdherenceHumansLaboratoriesLaboratory Proficiency TestingLeukocytes, MononuclearMonitoring, ImmunologicObserver VariationPractice Guidelines as TopicPredictive Value of TestsProgram DevelopmentQuality ControlBiomarkersCytokinesAutomated analysisICSPositivityRare eventsReproducibilityStandardization

Identifiers

PMID24727143
PMCPMC4138273
OpenAlexW2078818962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.