ArticleCirculation2014
Early results of Massachusetts healthcare reform on racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic disparities in cardiovascular care.
Article in Circulation, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.
- Examining Timeliness of Total Knee Replacement Among Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis in the U.S.: Results from the OAI and MOST Longitudinal Cohorts.The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume · 2020Pooled it
- Disparities in Surgical Access: A Systematic Literature Review, Conceptual Model, and Evidence Map.Journal of the American College of Surgeons · 2019Pooled it
- Disparities in Socioeconomic Context and Association With Blood Pressure Control and Cardiovascular Outcomes in ALLHAT.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2019Trial
- Population-Level Gaps in Coronary Artery Disease Care: A Focused Review.Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal · 2025Review
- The COVID-19 impact on STEMI disparities.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Racial/ethnic differences persist in treatment choice and outcomes in isolated intervention for coronary artery disease.The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2023Article
- Brief Review: Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Cardiovascular Care with a Focus on Congenital Heart Disease and Precision Medicine.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2023Review
- Social determinants of health in pulmonary embolism management and outcome in hospitals: Insights from the United States nationwide inpatient sample.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2023Article
- Socioeconomic Factors and their Impact on Access and Use of Coronary and Structural Interventions.European cardiology · 2022Review
- Black lives matter … in the cath lab, too! A proposal for the interventional cardiology community to counteract bias and racism.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2022Article
- Racism and Cardiology: A Global Call to Action.CJC open · 2021Review
- Ethnic and Racial Disparities in Acute Myocardial Infarction.Current cardiology reports · 2020Review
- The indirect costs of ischemic heart disease through lost productive life years for Australia from 2015 to 2030: results from a microsimulation model.BMC public health · 2019Article
- Achieving Health Equity by Normalizing Cardiac Care.Health equity · 2018Article
- The ACA: Impacts on Health, Access, and Employment.Forum for health economics & policy · 2016Article
- Racial and Ethnic Differences in Acute Coronary Syndrome and Myocardial Infarction Within the United States: From Demographics to Outcomes.Clinical cardiology · 2016Review
- Impact of Expanded Insurance Coverage on Racial Disparities in Vascular Disease: Insights From Massachusetts.Annals of surgery · 2016Article
- Population-level differences in revascularization treatment and outcomes among various United States subpopulations.World journal of cardiology · 2016Review
- Decomposing Black-White Disparities in Heart Disease Mortality in the United States, 1973-2010: An Age-Period-Cohort Analysis.American journal of epidemiology · 2015Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundInsured adults receive invasive cardiovascular procedures more frequently than uninsured adults. We examined the impact of healthcare reform in Massachusetts on use of coronary revascularization procedures and in-hospital and 1-year mortality by race/ethnicity, education, and sex. METHODS AND
resultsUsing hospital claims data, we compared differences in coronary revascularization rates (coronary artery bypass grafting or percutaneous coronary intervention) and in-hospital mortality by race/ethnicity, education, and sex among Massachusetts residents aged 21 to 64 years hospitalized with a principal discharge diagnosis of ischemic heart disease before (November 1, 2004, to July 31, 2006) and after (December 1, 2006, to September 30, 2008) reform; 1-year mortality was calculated for those undergoing revascularization. Adjusted logistic regression assessed 24 216 discharges before reform and 20 721 discharges after reform. Blacks had 30% lower odds of receiving coronary revascularization than whites in the prereform period. Compared with whites in the postreform period, blacks (odds ratio=0.73; 95% confidence interval, 0.63-0.84) and Hispanics (odds ratio= 0.84; 95% confidence interval, 0.74-0.97) were less likely and Asians (odds ratio=1.29; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.65) were more likely to receive coronary revascularization. Patients living in more educated communities, men, and persons with private insurance were more likely to receive coronary revascularization before and after reform. Compared with the prereform period, the adjusted odds of in-hospital mortality were higher in patients living in less-educated communities in the postreform period. No differences in 1-year mortality by race/ethnicity, education, or sex for revascularized patients were observed before or after reform.
conclusionsReducing insurance barriers to receipt of coronary revascularization procedures has not yet eliminated preexisting demographic and educational disparities in access to these procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.