Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24726998›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology2014

Disturbances in affective touch in hereditary sensory & autonomic neuropathy type III.

Vaughan G Macefield, Lucy Norcliffe-Kaufmann, Line Löken, Felicia B Axelrod, Horacio Kaufmann

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The familial dysautonomia disease geneDisease models & mechanisms · 2017
    Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Vaughan G MacefieldSchool of Medicine, University of Western Sydney, Australia; Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, Australia. Electronic address: v.macefield@uws.edu.au.
Lucy Norcliffe-KaufmannDysautonomia Center, NYU Langone Medical Center, NY, USA.
Line LökenOxford Centre for Functional MRI of the Brain (FMRIB), University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK.
Felicia B AxelrodDysautonomia Center, NYU Langone Medical Center, NY, USA.
Horacio KaufmannDysautonomia Center, NYU Langone Medical Center, NY, USA.
NYU Langone Health · USUniversity of Oxford · GBWestern Sydney University · AU

Funding

Training CoreU54NS065736 · NINDS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI FREEMAN, ROY · 2009 to 2018
$11.6M
NINDS NIH HHS U54 NS065736NINDS NIH HHS U54NS065736
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hereditary sensory and autonomic neuropathy type III (HSAN III, Riley-Day syndrome, Familial Dysautomia) is characterised by elevated thermal thresholds and an indifference to pain. Using microelectrode recordings we recently showed that these patients possess no functional stretch-sensitive mechanoreceptors in their muscles (muscle spindles), a feature that may explain their lack of stretch reflexes and ataxic gait, yet patients have apparently normal low-threshold cutaneous mechanoreceptors. The density of C-fibres in the skin is markedly reduced in patients with HSAN III, but it is not known whether the C-tactile afferents, a distinct type of low-threshold C fibre present in hairy skin that is sensitive to gentle stroking and has been implicated in the coding of pleasant touch are specifically affected in HSAN III patients. We addressed the relationship between C-tactile afferent function and pleasant touch perception in 15 patients with HSAN III and 15 age-matched control subjects. A soft make-up brush was used to apply stroking stimuli to the forearm and lateral aspect of the leg at five velocities: 0.3, 1, 3, 10 and 30 cm/s. As demonstrated previously, the control subjects rated the slowest and highest velocities as less pleasant than those applied at 1-10 cm/s, which fits with the optimal velocities for exciting C-tactile afferents. Conversely, for the patients, ratings of pleasantness did not fit the profile for C-tactile afferents. Patients either rated the higher velocities as more pleasant than the slow velocities, with the slowest velocities being rated unpleasant, or rated all velocities equally pleasant. We interpret this to reflect absent or reduced C-tactile afferent density in the skin of patients with HSAN III, who are likely using tactile cues (i.e. myelinated afferents) to rate pleasantness of stroking or are attributing pleasantness to this type of stimulus irrespective of velocity.

Indexed as

AffectTouchAdolescentAdultFemaleHereditary Sensory and Motor NeuropathyHot TemperatureHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhysical StimulationSensory ThresholdsVibrationYoung AdultAffective touchCT afferentsPleasant touchTactile sensation

Identifiers

PMID24726998
PMCPMC4078239
OpenAlexW2083236125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.