Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24725765›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2014

Understanding the acceptability of e-mental health--attitudes and expectations towards computerised self-help treatments for mental health problems.

Peter Musiat, Philip Goldstone, Nicholas Tarrier

6 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 6 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 125 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
125citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
14.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03068676 naterminatednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

A Pilot Study Investigating the Feasibility of Implementing Internet-delivered Treatments for Depression and Anxiety in Primary Care

TypeinterventionalSponsorSilver Cloud HealthRan2017 to 2018Enrolled12ConditionsDepressive Disorder, Anxiety Disorders, DepressionArmsSpace from Depression, Space from Anxiety
NCT05376735 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

An Exploratory Randomised Control Trial of a Single Session Intervention Combined With In-situ Socially Assistive Robot to Promote Emotion Regulation Competence in University Students

TypeinterventionalSponsorKing's College LondonRan2022 to 2022Enrolled100ConditionsAnxiety, Emotion RegulationArmsPurrble intervention, Single Session Intervention
NCT05449561 completednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Beyond Efficacy- Eliciting Preference for Face-to-face and Internet-based Psychotherapy Among People with Depression: Using Discrete Choice Experiment to Advance Future Service Implementation

TypeobservationalSponsorChinese University of Hong KongRan2022 to 2023Enrolled20ConditionsDepression
NCT05477420 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

A Survey Study and Effect of Web-based Decision Aids on Preferences Shift

TypeinterventionalSponsorChinese University of Hong KongRan2022 to 2024Enrolled148ConditionsDepression, PsychotherapiesArmsDecision Aid
NCT05701670 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

A Randomised Control Trial Investigating the Effects of Purrble and a Single Session Intervention on Emotional Regulation and Anxiety Among Students

TypeinterventionalSponsorKing's College LondonRan2023 to 2023Enrolled191ConditionsAnxiety, Emotion RegulationArmsPurrble+SSI
NCT06368557 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Internet-based Cognitive Behavioral Intervention for Adolescents With Anxiety Disorders

TypeinterventionalSponsorRegion of Southern DenmarkRan2023 to 2025Enrolled168ConditionsAnxiety DisordersArmsCoolMinds: Internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy (iCBT)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

125 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 304 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Does outcome expectancy predict outcomes in online depression prevention? Secondary analysis of randomised-controlled trials.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

65 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Peter MusiatKing's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, De Crespigny Park, PO-Box 077, London SE5 8AF, UK. Peter.Musiat@kcl.ac.uk.
Philip Goldstone
Nicholas Tarrier
King's College London · GB

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundE-mental health and m-mental health include the use of technology in the prevention, treatment and aftercare of mental health problems. With the economical pressure on mental health services increasing, e-mental health and m-mental health could bridge treatment gaps, reduce waiting times for patients and deliver interventions at lower costs. However, despite the existence of numerous effective interventions, the transition of computerised interventions into care is slow. The aim of the present study was to investigate the acceptability of e-mental health and m-mental health in the general population.

methodsAn advisory group of service users identified dimensions that potentially influence an individual's decision to engage with a particular treatment for mental health problems. A large sample (N = 490) recruited through email, flyers and social media was asked to rate the acceptability of different treatment options for mental health problems on these domains. Results were analysed using repeated measures MANOVA.

resultsParticipants rated the perceived helpfulness of an intervention, the ability to motivate users, intervention credibility, and immediate access without waiting time as most important dimensions with regard to engaging with a treatment for mental health problems. Participants expected face-to-face therapy to meet their needs on most of these dimensions. Computerised treatments and smartphone applications for mental health were reported to not meet participants' expectations on most domains. However, these interventions scored higher than face-to-face treatments on domains associated with the convenience of access. Overall, participants reported a very low likelihood of using computerised treatments for mental health in the future.

conclusionsIndividuals in this study expressed negative views about computerised self-help intervention and low likelihood of use in the future. To improve the implementation and uptake, policy makers need to improve the public perception of such interventions.

Indexed as

Mental HealthMental Health ServicesPatient Acceptance of Health CareSelf CareTherapy, Computer-AssistedAdolescentAdultAgedAttitudeFemaleHealth BehaviorHumansMaleMental DisordersMiddle AgedRemote Consultation

Identifiers

PMID24725765
PMCPMC3999507
OpenAlexW2034792075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.