Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24724832›Full record

ArticleBiochemistry2014

Rhodopsin TM6 can interact with two separate and distinct sites on arrestin: evidence for structural plasticity and multiple docking modes in arrestin-rhodopsin binding.

Abhinav Sinha, Amber M Jones Brunette, Jonathan F Fay, Christopher T Schafer, David L Farrens

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biochemistry, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Decay of an active GPCR: Conformational dynamics govern agonist rebinding and persistence of an active, yet empty, receptor state.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Abhinav SinhaDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Oregon Health and Science University , Portland, Oregon 97239-3098, United States.
Amber M Jones Brunette
Jonathan F Fay
Christopher T Schafer
David L Farrens
Oregon Health & Science University · US

Funding

BIOLOGICAL BASES OF DRUG-SEEKING BEHAVIORT32DA007262 · NIDA · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI WILLIAMS, JOHN T · 1991 to 2022
$9.4M
Program in Molecular and Cellular BiosciencesT32GM071338 · NIGMS · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI MASLEN, CHERYL L · 2005 to 2020
$3.5M
Structural Dynamics of Retinal Binding and ReleaseR01EY015436 · NEI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI FARRENS, DAVID L · 2006 to 2014
$2.6M
Translational Vision Science Research at Oregon Health & Science UniversityT32EY023211 · NEI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Yali Jia, Kate E Keller · 2013 to 2026
$2.4M
NEI NIH HHS 1T32EY023211NEI NIH HHS R01 EY015436NEI NIH HHS T32 EY023211NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA007262NIGMS NIH HHS 5T32GM071338NIGMS NIH HHS 5T32GM071338-08NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM071338
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Various studies have implicated the concave surface of arrestin in the binding of the cytosolic surface of rhodopsin. However, specific sites of contact between the two proteins have not previously been defined in detail. Here, we report that arrestin shares part of the same binding site on rhodopsin as does the transducin Gα subunit C-terminal tail, suggesting binding of both proteins to rhodopsin may share some similar underlying mechanisms. We also identify two areas of contact between the proteins near this region. Both sites lie in the arrestin N-domain, one in the so-called "finger" loop (residues 67-79) and the other in the 160 loop (residues 155-165). We mapped these sites using a novel tryptophan-induced quenching method, in which we introduced Trp residues into arrestin and measured their ability to quench the fluorescence of bimane probes attached to cysteine residues on TM6 of rhodopsin (T242C and T243C). The involvement of finger loop binding to rhodopsin was expected, but the evidence of the arrestin 160 loop contacting rhodopsin was not. Remarkably, our data indicate one site on rhodopsin can interact with multiple structurally separate sites on arrestin that are almost 30 Å apart. Although this observation at first seems paradoxical, in fact, it provides strong support for recent hypotheses that structural plasticity and conformational changes are involved in the arrestin-rhodopsin binding interface and that the two proteins may be able to interact through multiple docking modes, with arrestin binding to both monomeric and dimeric rhodopsin.

Indexed as

AnimalsArrestinBinding SitesCattleChlorocebus aethiopsCOS CellsProtein BindingProtein Structure, SecondaryProtein Structure, TertiaryRhodopsinArrestinRhodopsin

Identifiers

PMID24724832
PMCPMC4039336
OpenAlexW2323786468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.