ArticleThe Journal of reproductive medicine
Handoff quality for obstetrical inpatients varies depending on time of day and provider type.
Article in The Journal of reproductive medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical handover communication at maternity shift changes and women's safety in Banjul, the Gambia: a mixed-methods study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2022Article
- Obstetric shift-to-shift handover in Kerala, India: A cross-sectional mixed method study.PloS one · 2022Article
- Leveraging Telemedicine Infrastructure to Monitor Quality of Operating Room to Intensive Care Unit Handoffs.Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo determine whether obstetric handoff quality differs morning versus evening, weekend versus weekday, or based on provider type. STUDY
designUsing the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) handoff guidelines, we developed an observational tool to assess whether handoffs included its 8 recommended elements. We observed handoffs between attending obstetricians, Obstetrics and Gynecology residents, labor and delivery nurses, and certified nurse midwives. Observation times included a balance of morning, evening, weekdays, and weekends. Participants were blinded to the study objectives. We defined high-quality handoffs as those that included 7 of the 8 recommended ACOG elements.
resultsA total of 425 inpatient handoffs were observed: 233 (55%) were morning handoffs and 189 (45%) were evening; 251 (59%) were on weekdays and 171 (41%) on weekends. Of the handoffs observed, 201 (48%) were presented by residents, 139 (33%) by nurses, 56 (13%) by attending obstetricians, and 26 (6%) by midwives. Only 169 (40%) of all handoffs met criteria for high quality. A greater percentage of all morning handoffs met criteria as compared to evening handoffs (45% vs. 34%, p < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the overall percentage of weekday and weekend handoffs meeting criteria (39% vs. 42%, p = 0.48). Residents had a higher percentage of high-quality handoffs as compared to nurses (55% vs. 32%, p < 0.001).
conclusionBased on criteria developed for this study, handoff quality may vary based on time of day and provider type. These findings present an opportunity to further assess reasons for variation and propose changes to standardize and improve the handoff process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24724215PMC4937457What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.