Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24724106›Full record

ReviewBioMed research international2014

Controversial issues in kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty in osteoporotic vertebral fractures.

Ioannis D Papanastassiou, Andreas Filis, Maria A Gerochristou, Frank D Vrionis

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BioMed research international, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Long-term safety and clinical performance of kyphoplasty and SpineJack® procedures in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a pilot, monocentric, investigator-initiated study.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2019
    Trial
  2. Safety and clinical performance of kyphoplasty and SpineJack(®) procedures in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a pilot, monocentric, investigator-initiated study.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2016
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Percutaneous vertebral augmentation-pearls and pitfalls.Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong) · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Prediction of lumbar vertebral strength of elderly men based on quantitative computed tomography images using machine learning.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Polymethylmethacrylate Pulmonary Embolism Following Kyphoplasty.Clinical practice and cases in emergency medicine · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Ioannis D PapanastassiouH. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Neuro-Oncology Program and Department of NeuroOncology and Orthopaedics, University of South Florida College of Medicine, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL 33647, USA ; General Oncological Hospital Kifisias "Agioi Anargyroi", Athens, Greece.
Andreas FilisH. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Neuro-Oncology Program and Department of NeuroOncology and Orthopaedics, University of South Florida College of Medicine, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL 33647, USA.
Maria A Gerochristou"Andreas Syngros" Hospital, 16121 Athens, Greece.
Frank D VrionisH. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Neuro-Oncology Program and Department of NeuroOncology and Orthopaedics, University of South Florida College of Medicine, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL 33647, USA.
Andreas Sygros Hospital · GRFlorida College · USHospital Agioi Anargyroi · GRMoffitt Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Kyphoplasty (KP) and vertebroplasty (VP) have been successfully employed for many years for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral fractures. The purpose of this review is to resolve the controversial issues raised by the two randomized trials that claimed no difference between VP and SHAM procedure. In particular we compare nonsurgical management (NSM) and KP and VP, in terms of clinical parameters (pain, disability, quality of life, and new fractures), cost-effectiveness, radiological variables (kyphosis correction and vertebral height restoration), and VP versus KP for cement extravasation and complications profile. Cement types and optimal filling are analyzed and technological innovations are presented. Finally unipedicular/bipedicular techniques are compared. Conclusion. VP and KP are superior to NSM in clinical and radiological parameters and probably more cost-effective. KP is superior to VP in sagittal balance improvement and cement leaking. Complications are rare but serious adverse events have been described, so caution should be exerted. Unilateral procedures should be pursued whenever feasible. Upcoming randomized trials (CEEP, OSTEO-6, STIC-2, and VERTOS IV) will provide the missing link.

Indexed as

KyphoplastyAnimalsHumansOsteoporotic FracturesSpinal InjuriesSpine

Identifiers

PMID24724106
PMCPMC3960523
OpenAlexW2066958602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.