Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24724087›Full record

ArticleBioMed research international2014

Development of a promising fish model (Oryzias melastigma) for assessing multiple responses to stresses in the marine environment.

Sijun Dong, Mei Kang, Xinlong Wu, Ting Ye

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioMed research international, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Proteomic and in silico characterization of stress-responsive proteins in the prawn penaeus indsicus under sublethal copper toxicity.Biometals : an international journal on the role of metal ions in biology, biochemistry, and medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Screening and Identification of Hnf1ba-International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Retinal Cone Mosaic in sws1-Mutant Medaka (Oryzias latipes), A Teleost.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sijun DongKey Lab of Urban Environment and Health, Institute of Urban Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Number 1799 Jimei Street, Xiamen 361021, China.
Mei KangKey Lab of Urban Environment and Health, Institute of Urban Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Number 1799 Jimei Street, Xiamen 361021, China.
Xinlong WuKey Lab of Urban Environment and Health, Institute of Urban Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Number 1799 Jimei Street, Xiamen 361021, China.
Ting YeKey Lab of Urban Environment and Health, Institute of Urban Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Number 1799 Jimei Street, Xiamen 361021, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the increasing number of contaminants in the marine environment, various experimental organisms have been "taken into labs" by investigators to find the most suitable environmentally relevant models for toxicity testing. The marine medaka, Oryzias melastigma, has a number of advantages that make it a prime candidate for these tests. Recently, many studies have been conducted on marine medaka, especially in terms of their physiological, biochemical, and molecular responses after exposure to contaminants and other environmental stressors. This review provides a literature survey highlighting the steady increase of ecotoxicological research on marine medaka, summarizes the advantages of using O. melastigma as a tool for toxicological research, and promotes the utilization of this organism in future studies.

Indexed as

EcosystemModels, BiologicalOryziasStress, PhysiologicalAnimalsOceans and Seas

Identifiers

PMID24724087
PMCPMC3958766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.