ArticleBlood research2014
Clinical features and treatment outcomes in patients with mantle cell lymphoma in Korea: Study by the Consortium for Improving Survival of Lymphoma.
Article in Blood research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Treatment evolution and survival impact of consolidation therapies in mantle cell lymphoma: insights from an Asia-Pacific real-world registry.Blood cancer journal · 2026Article
- POD24-Based prognostic signature enables personalized risk stratification in mantle cell lymphoma.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Mantle cell lymphoma treatment options for elderly/unfit patients: A systematic review.EJHaem · 2022Review
- Genetic heterogeneity and prognostic impact of recurrent ANK2 and TP53 mutations in mantle cell lymphoma: a multi-centre cohort study.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Treatment of mantle cell lymphoma in Asia: a consensus paper from the Asian Lymphoma Study Group.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2020Review
- Nomogram incorporating clinicopathological parameters to predict the survival of patients with mantle cell lymphoma.Journal of investigative medicine : the official publication of the American Federation for Clinical Research · 2019Article
- Lymphoma epidemiology in Korea and the real clinical field including the Consortium for Improving Survival of Lymphoma (CISL) trial.International journal of hematology · 2018Review
- The Consortium for Improving Survival of Lymphoma (CISL): recent achievements and future perspective.Blood research · 2017Review
- Negative prognostic impact of low absolute CD4Cancer science · 2016Article
- Mantle cell lymphoma: a model for risk-adapted treatment approach.Blood research · 2014Article
- Primary mantle cell lymphoma of the nasopharynx: a rare clinical entity.Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors at 15 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWe investigated the clinical features and treatment outcomes of patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) in Korea.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical characteristics and prognosis of 131 patients diagnosed with MCL between January 2004 and December 2009 at 15 medical centers in Korea; all patients received at least 1 chemotherapeutic regimen for MCL.
resultsThe median age for the patients was 63 years (range, 26-78 years), and 77.9% were men. A total of 105 patients (80.1%) had stage III or IV MCL at diagnosis. Fifty-two patients (39.7%) were categorized with high- or high-intermediate risk MCL according to the International Prognostic Index (IPI). Eighteen patients (13.7%) were in the high-risk group according to the simplified MCL-IPI (MIPI). The overall incidence of extranodal involvement was 69.5%. The overall incidence of bone marrow and gastrointestinal involvements at diagnosis was 41.2% and 35.1%, respectively. Cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisolone, and rituximab were used frequently as the first-line treatment (41.2%). With a median follow-up duration of 20.0 months (range, 0.2-77.0 months), the overall survival (OS) at 2 years was 64.7%, while the event-free survival (EFS) was 39.7%. Multivariate analysis showed that the simplified MIPI was significantly associated with OS. However, the use of a rituximab-containing regimen was not associated with OS and EFS.
conclusionSimilar to results from Western countries, the current study found that simplified MIPI was an important prognostic factor in Korean patients with MCL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.