Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24723886›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in aging neuroscience2014

The effects of automated artifact removal algorithms on electroencephalography-based Alzheimer's disease diagnosis.

Raymundo Cassani, Tiago H Falk, Francisco J Fraga, Paulo A M Kanda, Renato Anghinah

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. On-line EEG Denoising and Cleaning Using Correlated Sparse Recovery and Active Learning.International journal of wireless information networks · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Raymundo CassaniInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique, Centre Énergie, Matériaux, Télécommunications, University of Quebec Montreal, QC, Canada.
Tiago H FalkInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique, Centre Énergie, Matériaux, Télécommunications, University of Quebec Montreal, QC, Canada.
Francisco J FragaInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique, Centre Énergie, Matériaux, Télécommunications, University of Quebec Montreal, QC, Canada ; Engineering, Modelling and Applied Social Sciences Center, Universidade Federal do ABC São Paulo, Brazil.
Paulo A M KandaReference Center of Behavioural Disturbances and Dementia, School of Medicine, Universidade de São Paulo São Paulo, Brazil.
Renato AnghinahReference Center of Behavioural Disturbances and Dementia, School of Medicine, Universidade de São Paulo São Paulo, Brazil.
Universidade de São Paulo · BRUniversité du Québec à Montréal · CAInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the last decade, electroencephalography (EEG) has emerged as a reliable tool for the diagnosis of cortical disorders such as Alzheimer's disease (AD). EEG signals, however, are susceptible to several artifacts, such as ocular, muscular, movement, and environmental. To overcome this limitation, existing diagnostic systems commonly depend on experienced clinicians to manually select artifact-free epochs from the collected multi-channel EEG data. Manual selection, however, is a tedious and time-consuming process, rendering the diagnostic system "semi-automated." Notwithstanding, a number of EEG artifact removal algorithms have been proposed in the literature. The (dis)advantages of using such algorithms in automated AD diagnostic systems, however, have not been documented; this paper aims to fill this gap. Here, we investigate the effects of three state-of-the-art automated artifact removal (AAR) algorithms (both alone and in combination with each other) on AD diagnostic systems based on four different classes of EEG features, namely, spectral, amplitude modulation rate of change, coherence, and phase. The three AAR algorithms tested are statistical artifact rejection (SAR), blind source separation based on second order blind identification and canonical correlation analysis (BSS-SOBI-CCA), and wavelet enhanced independent component analysis (wICA). Experimental results based on 20-channel resting-awake EEG data collected from 59 participants (20 patients with mild AD, 15 with moderate-to-severe AD, and 24 age-matched healthy controls) showed the wICA algorithm alone outperforming other enhancement algorithm combinations across three tasks: diagnosis (control vs. mild vs. moderate), early detection (control vs. mild), and disease progression (mild vs. moderate), thus opening the doors for fully-automated systems that can assist clinicians with early detection of AD, as well as disease severity progression assessment.

Indexed as

Alzheimer's diseaseamplitude modulationautomatic diagnosisEEG artifactselectroencephalogramSVM

Identifiers

PMID24723886
PMCPMC3971195
OpenAlexW2163092406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.