Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24723883›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neuroinformatics2014

A review of multivariate analyses in imaging genetics.

Jingyu Liu, Vince D Calhoun

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neuroinformatics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Genetic analysis of imaging-derived phenotypes.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. L2RM: Low-rank Linear Regression Models for High-dimensional Matrix Responses.Journal of the American Statistical Association · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jingyu LiuThe Mind Research Network and Lovelace Biomedical and Environmental Research Institute Albuquerque, NM, USA ; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of New Mexico Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Vince D CalhounThe Mind Research Network and Lovelace Biomedical and Environmental Research Institute Albuquerque, NM, USA ; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of New Mexico Albuquerque, NM, USA.

Funding

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Treatment of Auditory Verbal HalluciP20GM103472 · NIGMS · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI ABBOTT, CHRISTOPHER C · 2012 to 2017
$14.3M
NEURAL MECHANISMS OF SCHIZOPHRENIAP20RR021938 · NCRR · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI JUNG, REX · 2008 to 2011
$9.4M
Informed Data-Driven Fusion of Behavior, Brain Function, and GenesR01EB005846 · NIBIB · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI CALHOUN, VINCE D · 2005 to 2016
$5.5M
A multilevel vulnerability study of substance abuse via CNV, brain activation andR33DA027626 · NIDA · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI LIU, JINGYU · 2011 to 2012
$668k
NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR021938NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB005846NIDA NIH HHS R33 DA027626NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103472
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances in neuroimaging technology and molecular genetics provide the unique opportunity to investigate genetic influence on the variation of brain attributes. Since the year 2000, when the initial publication on brain imaging and genetics was released, imaging genetics has been a rapidly growing research approach with increasing publications every year. Several reviews have been offered to the research community focusing on various study designs. In addition to study design, analytic tools and their proper implementation are also critical to the success of a study. In this review, we survey recent publications using data from neuroimaging and genetics, focusing on methods capturing multivariate effects accommodating the large number of variables from both imaging data and genetic data. We group the analyses of genetic or genomic data into either a priori driven or data driven approach, including gene-set enrichment analysis, multifactor dimensionality reduction, principal component analysis, independent component analysis (ICA), and clustering. For the analyses of imaging data, ICA and extensions of ICA are the most widely used multivariate methods. Given detailed reviews of multivariate analyses of imaging data available elsewhere, we provide a brief summary here that includes a recently proposed method known as independent vector analysis. Finally, we review methods focused on bridging the imaging and genetic data by establishing multivariate and multiple genotype-phenotype-associations, including sparse partial least squares, sparse canonical correlation analysis, sparse reduced rank regression and parallel ICA. These methods are designed to extract latent variables from both genetic and imaging data, which become new genotypes and phenotypes, and the links between the new genotype-phenotype pairs are maximized using different cost functions. The relationship between these methods along with their assumptions, advantages, and limitations are discussed.

Indexed as

genotypeimaging geneticsintermediate phenotypesmultivariate analysesphenotype

Identifiers

PMID24723883
PMCPMC3972473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.