ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2014
A synthesis of evidence on inhibitory control and auditory hallucinations based on the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) framework.
Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Examining the relationships between cognition and auditory hallucinations: A systematic review.The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry · 2024Pooled it
- The efficacy of real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging neurofeedback for psychiatric illness: A meta-analysis of brain and behavioral outcomes.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Hallucinations in schizophrenia and Parkinson's disease: an analysis of sensory modalities involved and the repercussion on patients.Scientific reports · 2016Trial
- [Cognitive control in the research domain criteria system: clinical implications for auditory verbal hallucinations].Der Nervenarzt · 2021Review
- Behavioral measures of attention and cognitive control during a new auditory working memory paradigm.Behavior research methods · 2020Article
- Mobile RDoC: Using Smartphones to Understand the Relationship Between Auditory Verbal Hallucinations and Need for Care.Schizophrenia bulletin open · 2020Article
- Intentional inhibition but not source memory is related to hallucination-proneness and intrusive thoughts in a university sample.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2019Article
- Auditory Verbal Hallucinations in Schizophrenia From a Levels of Explanation Perspective.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2018Review
- Understanding Suicide Risk within the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) Framework: Insights, Challenges, and Future Research Considerations.Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2017Article
- Achieving success with the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC): Going beyond the matrix.Psychophysiology · 2016Article
- Auditory hallucinations: A review of the ERC "VOICE" project.World journal of psychiatry · 2015Review
- Molecular psychiatry: 20 years.Molecular psychiatry · 2015Article
- Focus on psychosis.Dialogues in clinical neuroscience · 2015Review
- Decreased expression of the APOA1-APOC3-APOA4 gene cluster is associated with risk of Alzheimer's disease.Drug design, development and therapy · 2015Article
- The impacts of a GO-game (Chinese chess) intervention on Alzheimer disease in a Northeast Chinese population.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2015Article
- Integrating NIMH Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) into PTSD Research.Current topics in behavioral neurosciencesReview
- A Neuropsychological Approach to Auditory Verbal Hallucinations and Thought Insertion - Grounded in Normal Voice Perception.Review of philosophy and psychologyArticle
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The National Institute of Mental Health initiative called the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) project aims to provide a new approach to understanding mental illness grounded in the fundamental domains of human behavior and psychological functioning. To this end the RDoC framework encourages researchers and clinicians to think outside the [diagnostic] box, by studying symptoms, behaviors or biomarkers that cut across traditional mental illness categories. In this article we examine and discuss how the RDoC framework can improve our understanding of psychopathology by zeroing in on hallucinations- now widely recognized as a symptom that occurs in a range of clinical and non-clinical groups. We focus on a single domain of functioning-namely cognitive [inhibitory] control-and assimilate key findings structured around the basic RDoC "units of analysis," which span the range from observable behavior to molecular genetics. Our synthesis and critique of the literature provides a deeper understanding of the mechanisms involved in the emergence of auditory hallucinations, linked to the individual dynamics of inhibitory development before and after puberty; favors separate developmental trajectories for clinical and non-clinical hallucinations; yields new insights into co-occurring emotional and behavioral problems; and suggests some novel avenues for treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.