ArticleIEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering2015
Variable Ventilation as a Diagnostic Tool for the Injured Lung.
Article in IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Tracking respiratory mechanics around natural breathing rates via variable ventilation.Scientific reports · 2020Trial
- Current Research Status of Respiratory Motion for Thorax and Abdominal Treatment: A Systematic Review.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Alveolar Micromechanics in Bleomycin-induced Lung Injury.American journal of respiratory cell and molecular biology · 2018Article
- Ventilator-induced lung injury and lung mechanics.Annals of translational medicine · 2018Review
- Predicting the response of the injured lung to the mechanical breath profile.Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Mechanical ventilation of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a necessary life support measure which may lead to ventilator-induced lung injury, a complication that can be reduced or ameliorated by using appropriate tidal volumes and positive end-expiratory pressures. However, the optimal mechanical ventilation parameters are almost certainly different for each patient, and will vary with time as the injury status of the lung changes. In order to optimize mechanical ventilation in an individual ARDS patient, therefore, it is necessary to track the manner in which injury status is reflected in the mechanical properties of the lungs. Accordingly, we developed an algorithm for assessing the time-dependent manner in which different lung regions open (recruit) and close (derecruit) as a function of the pressure waveform that is applied to the airways during mechanical ventilation. We used this algorithm to test the notion that variable ventilation provides the dynamic perturbations in lung volume necessary to accurately identify recruitment/derecruitment dynamics in the injured lung. We performed this test on synthetic pressure and flow data generated with established numerical models of lung function corresponding to both healthy mice and mice with lung injury. The data were generated by subjecting the models to a variety of mechanical ventilation regimens including variable ventilation. Our results support the hypothesis that variable ventilation can be used as a diagnostic tool to identify the injury status of the lung in ARDS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.