Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24723619›Full record

SynthesisSexually transmitted infections2014

The use of web-based diaries in sexual risk behaviour research: a systematic review.

Carolyn Stalgaitis, Sara Nelson Glick

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Sexually transmitted infections, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Carolyn StalgaitisDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Sara Nelson GlickDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.

Funding

The District of Columbia Developmental Center for AIDS Research (DC D-CFAR)P30AI087714 · NIAID · GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MILLER, VERONICA · 2010 to 2014
$8.4M
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI087714
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn increasing number of studies have used the diary method, which provides quantitative event-level data about sexual encounters. Diaries are an attractive tool for sexual behaviour research, yet little is known about the range of uses, methodological issues and best practices associated with this technology.

objectivesTo conduct a systematic review of the literature regarding the use of web-based diaries in sexual risk behaviour studies.

designSystematic review. DATA SOURCES: Five bibliographical databases, supplemented by references from previous reviews.

methodsEligible studies were published in English before August 2013, used the internet to transmit data from collection device to study staff, and measured behaviours affecting HIV or sexually transmitted infection transmission risk. The primary author conducted an initial screen to eliminate irrelevant articles. Both authors conducted full-text reviews to determine final articles. We abstracted data on diary methodology, validity and reactivity (behaviour change caused by diary completion).

resultsTwenty-three articles representing 15 studies were identified. Most diaries were collected daily for 1 month via websites, and completion was generally high (>80%). Compensation varied by study and was not associated with completion. Studies comparing diary with retrospective survey data demonstrated evidence of over-reporting on retrospective tools, except for the least frequent behaviours. Most studies that assessed reactivity as a result of diary completion demonstrated some change in behaviour associated with frequent monitoring.

conclusionsWeb-based diaries are an effective means of studying sexual risk behaviour. More uniform reporting and further research on the extent of reactivity are needed.

Indexed as

InternetMedical RecordsRisk-TakingSexual BehaviorData CollectionFemaleHumansMalePatient ComplianceRetrospective StudiesSexually Transmitted DiseasesEPIDEMIOLOGY (GENERAL)INFORMATION TECHNOLOGYSEXUAL BEHAVIOURSYSTEMATIC REVIEWS

Identifiers

PMID24723619
PMCPMC4102638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.