Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24723486›Full record

ArticleGenes, chromosomes & cancer2014

Distinct transcriptional signature and immunoprofile of CIC-DUX4 fusion-positive round cell tumors compared to EWSR1-rearranged Ewing sarcomas: further evidence toward distinct pathologic entities.

Katja Specht, Yun-Shao Sung, Lei Zhang, Günther H S Richter, Christopher D Fletcher, Cristina R Antonescu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, chromosomes & cancer, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 117 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
117citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
18.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

117 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 240 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Clinical case reports · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Editorial: New strategies for treating fusion-driven sarcomas.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

57 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Katja SpechtInstitute of Pathology, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Yun-Shao Sung
Lei Zhang
Günther H S Richter
Christopher D Fletcher
Cristina R Antonescu
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USKlinikum rechts der Isar · DETechnical University of Munich · DE

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
SOFT TISSUE SARCOMA PROGRAM PROJECTP01CA047179 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI LADANYI, MARC · 1989 to 2010
$17.3M
SPORE in Soft Tissue SarcomaP50CA140146 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI SPRIGGS, DAVID R · 2010 to 2014
$11.1M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA047179NCI NIH HHS P01CA47179NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS P50 CA140146NCI NIH HHS P50 CA 140146-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Round cell sarcomas harboring CIC-DUX4 fusions have recently been described as highly aggressive soft tissue tumors of children and young adults. Due to partial morphologic and immunohistochemical overlap with Ewing sarcoma (ES), CIC-DUX4-positive tumors have generally been classified as ES-like and managed similarly; however, a systematic comparison at the molecular and immunohistochemical levels between these two groups has not yet been conducted. Based on an initial observation that CIC-DUX4-positive tumors show nuclear immunoreactivity for WT1 and ETS transcription factors, FLI1 and ERG, we performed a detailed immunohistochemical and molecular analysis including these markers, to further investigate the relationship between CIC-DUX4 tumors and ES. The study group included 21 CIC-DUX4-positive sarcomas and 20 EWSR1-rearranged ES. Immunohistochemically, CIC-DUX4 sarcomas showed membranous CD99 positivity in 18 (86%) cases, but only 5 (24%) with a diffuse pattern, while WT1 and FLI1 were strongly positive in all cases. ERG was positive in 18% of cases. All ES expressed CD99 and FLI1, while ERG positivity was only seen in EWSR1-ERG fusion positive ES. WT1 was negative in all ES. Expression profiling validated by q-PCR revealed a distinct gene signature associated with CIC-DUX4 fusion, with upregulation of ETS transcription factors (ETV4, ETV1, and ETV5) and WT1, among top overexpressed genes compared to ES, other sarcomas and normal tissue. In conclusion, the distinct gene signature and immunoprofile of CIC-DUX4 sarcomas suggest a distinct pathogenesis from ES. The consistent WT1 expression may provide a useful clue in the diagnosis in the context of round cell sarcomas negative for EWSR1 rearrangement. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Indexed as

Translocation, GeneticAdolescentAdultBone NeoplasmsCalmodulin-Binding ProteinsCell Line, TumorChildFemaleGene RearrangementHumansImmunohistochemistryMaleMiddle AgedOncogene Proteins, FusionRNA-Binding Protein EWSRNA-Binding ProteinsCalmodulin-Binding ProteinsCIC-DUX4 fusion protein, humanEWSR1 protein, humanOncogene Proteins, FusionRNA-Binding Protein EWSRNA-Binding Proteins

Identifiers

PMID24723486
PMCPMC4108073
OpenAlexW1933020950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.