Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24723419›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2014

Limited gene misregulation is exacerbated by allele-specific upregulation in lethal hybrids between Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans.

Kevin H-C Wei, Andrew G Clark, Daniel A Barbash

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Frontiers in genetics · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Gene Regulation and Speciation.Trends in genetics : TIG · 2017
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kevin H-C WeiDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University.
Andrew G ClarkDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University.
Daniel A BarbashDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University dab87@cornell.edu.

Funding

PREDOCTORAL TRAINING IN GENETICS AND DEVELOPMENTT32GM007617 · NIGMS · CORNELL UNIVERSITY ITHACA · PI BARBASH, DANIEL A · 1985 to 2021
$5.5M
Molecular Genetics of Drosophila Hybrid LethalityR01GM074737 · NIGMS · CORNELL UNIVERSITY ITHACA · PI BARBASH, DANIEL A · 2005 to 2022
$4.7M
Functional /Comparative Genomic of Drosophila immunityR01AI064950 · NIAID · CORNELL UNIVERSITY ITHACA · PI CLARK, ANDREW G, LAZZARO, BRIAN · 2005 to 2016
$3.7M
NIAID NIH HHS AI064950NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI064950NIGMS NIH HHS GM074737NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM074737NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007617
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Misregulation of gene expression is often observed in interspecific hybrids and is generally attributed to regulatory incompatibilities caused by divergence between the two genomes. However, it has been challenging to distinguish effects of regulatory divergence from secondary effects including developmental and physiological defects common to hybrids. Here, we use RNA-Seq to profile gene expression in F1 hybrid male larvae from crosses of Drosophila melanogaster to its sibling species D. simulans. We analyze lethal and viable hybrid males, the latter produced using a mutation in the X-linked D. melanogaster Hybrid male rescue (Hmr) gene and compare them with their parental species and to public data sets of gene expression across development. We find that Hmr has drastically different effects on the parental and hybrid genomes, demonstrating that hybrid incompatibility genes can exhibit novel properties in the hybrid genetic background. Additionally, we find that D. melanogaster alleles are preferentially affected between lethal and viable hybrids. We further determine that many of the differences between the hybrids result from developmental delay in the Hmr(+) hybrids. Finally, we find surprisingly modest expression differences in hybrids when compared with the parents, with only 9% and 4% of genes deviating from additivity or expressed outside of the parental range, respectively. Most of these differences can be attributed to developmental delay and differences in tissue types. Overall, our study suggests that hybrid gene misexpression is prone to overestimation and that even between species separated by approximately 2.5 Ma, regulatory incompatibilities are not widespread in hybrids.

Indexed as

AnimalsDrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsGene Expression RegulationGenes, LethalGenes, X-LinkedGenetic SpeciationHybridization, GeneticMaleSequence Analysis, RNASpecies SpecificityDrosophila ProteinsHmr protein, Drosophilaallele-specific expressionevolution of gene regulationhybrid incompatibilityspeciation

Identifiers

PMID24723419
PMCPMC4069615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.