Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24722772›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Low-dose formaldehyde delays DNA damage recognition and DNA excision repair in human cells.

Andreas Luch, Flurina C Clement Frey, Regula Meier, Jia Fei, Hanspeter Naegeli

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Application of the Key Characteristics of Carcinogens to Per and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Andreas LuchDepartment of Product Safety, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Berlin, Germany.
Flurina C Clement FreyInstitute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Zürich-Vetsuisse, Zürich, Switzerland.
Regula MeierInstitute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Zürich-Vetsuisse, Zürich, Switzerland.
Jia FeiInstitute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Zürich-Vetsuisse, Zürich, Switzerland.
Hanspeter NaegeliInstitute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Zürich-Vetsuisse, Zürich, Switzerland.
University of Zurich · CHFederal Institute for Risk Assessment · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveFormaldehyde is still widely employed as a universal crosslinking agent, preservative and disinfectant, despite its proven carcinogenicity in occupationally exposed workers. Therefore, it is of paramount importance to understand the possible impact of low-dose formaldehyde exposures in the general population. Due to the concomitant occurrence of multiple indoor and outdoor toxicants, we tested how formaldehyde, at micromolar concentrations, interferes with general DNA damage recognition and excision processes that remove some of the most frequently inflicted DNA lesions. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsThe overall mobility of the DNA damage sensors UV-DDB (ultraviolet-damaged DNA-binding) and XPC (xeroderma pigmentosum group C) was analyzed by assessing real-time protein dynamics in the nucleus of cultured human cells exposed to non-cytotoxic (<100 μM) formaldehyde concentrations. The DNA lesion-specific recruitment of these damage sensors was tested by monitoring their accumulation at local irradiation spots. DNA repair activity was determined in host-cell reactivation assays and, more directly, by measuring the excision of DNA lesions from chromosomes. Taken together, these assays demonstrated that formaldehyde obstructs the rapid nuclear trafficking of DNA damage sensors and, consequently, slows down their relocation to DNA damage sites thus delaying the excision repair of target lesions. A concentration-dependent effect relationship established a threshold concentration of as low as 25 micromolar for the inhibition of DNA excision repair. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: A main implication of the retarded repair activity is that low-dose formaldehyde may exert an adjuvant role in carcinogenesis by impeding the excision of multiple mutagenic base lesions. In view of this generally disruptive effect on DNA repair, we propose that formaldehyde exposures in the general population should be further decreased to help reducing cancer risks.

Indexed as

Active Transport, Cell NucleusCells, CulturedChromatinCulture MediaDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA DamageDNA RepairFibroblastsFluorescence Recovery After PhotobleachingFormaldehydeHumansUltraviolet RaysChromatinCulture MediaDNA-Binding ProteinsFormaldehydeXPC protein, human

Identifiers

PMID24722772
PMCPMC3983121
OpenAlexW2060410841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.