Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24722628›Full record

ReviewPLoS pathogens2014

Pernicious pathogens or expedient elements of inheritance: the significance of yeast prions.

James S Byers, Daniel F Jarosz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PLoS pathogens, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Protein aggregation and the evolution of stress resistance in clinical yeast.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Generating new prions by targeted mutation or segment duplication.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

James S ByersDepartments of Chemical and Systems Biology and of Developmental Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Daniel F JaroszDepartments of Chemical and Systems Biology and of Developmental Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States of America.

Funding

GENETICS TRAINING PROGRAM FOR PHD CANDIDATEST32GM007790 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BRUNET, ANNE, KINGSLEY, DAVID M · 1985 to 2020
$12.8M
Quantitative analysis of the evolving genotype-to-phenotype mapR00GM098600 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI JAROSZ, DANIEL · 2013 to 2015
$728k
NIGMS NIH HHS R00 GM098600NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007790
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Peptide Termination FactorsPodosporaPrionsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsPeptide Termination FactorsPrionsSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSUP35 protein, S cerevisiae

Identifiers

PMID24722628
PMCPMC3983059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.