Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24722485›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Estimation of the relative sensitivity of qPCR analysis using pooled samples.

Ana Muniesa, Chelo Ferreira, Héctor Fuertes, Nabil Halaihel, Ignacio de Blas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Development of a Multiplex Real-Time PCR to DisambiguateCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ana MuniesaDepartment of Animal Pathology, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.
Chelo FerreiraDepartment of Applied Mathematics, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.
Héctor FuertesDepartment of Animal Pathology, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.
Nabil HalaihelDepartment of Animal Pathology, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.
Ignacio de BlasDepartment of Animal Pathology, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The high sensitivity of qPCR makes it a desirable diagnostic method in epidemiological surveillance programs. However, due to high costs, the use of pooling has been suggested. In this paper, an algorithm based on the Montecarlo method has been designed and implemented. The algorithm had been tested in many different situations, and finally it was validated with a real dataset. Moreover, based on the results obtained and depending on pooling conditions, a drastic decrease of sensitivity is observed.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAnimalsBacterial InfectionsHumansModels, StatisticalMonte Carlo MethodPrevalenceProbabilityReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionRegression AnalysisReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID24722485
PMCPMC3983103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.