Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24722324›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in neurology2014

Current developments in understanding of West Nile virus central nervous system disease.

Kenneth L Tyler

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in neurology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Neurology of Acute Viral Infections.The Neurohospitalist · 2022
    Review
  4. Review
  5. West Nile Virus Seroprevalence in an Outdoor Nonhuman Primate Breeding Colony in South Florida.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The Clinical Approach to Encephalitis.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kenneth L TyleraDepartment of Neurology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora bDenver Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Eastern Colorado Healthcare System, Denver, Colorado, USA.
GTx (United States) · US

Funding

Identification and evaluation of novel therapeutic targets for virus-induced neuronal diseaseR33AI101064 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI TYLER, KENNETH L. · 2014 to 2016
$1.4M
Cellular genes and signaling pathways as therapeutic targets for virus-induced CNR01NS076512 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI TYLER, KENNETH L. · 2011 to 2014
$1.4M
Mali International Center for Excellence in Research: Malaria immunologyZ01AI001064 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI PIERCE, SUSAN · 2008 to 2008
$712k
Identification and evaluation of novel therapeutic targets for virus-induced neuronal diseaseR21AI101064 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI TYLER, KENNETH L. · 2012 to 2013
$414k
Role of Microglia in Protection Against West Nile Virus-induced CNS Injury: mechanisms and treatment strategiesI01BX000963 · VA · VA EASTERN COLORADO HEALTH CARE SYSTEM · PI Kenneth L. Tyler · 2012 to 2026
–
BLRD VA I01 BX000963Intramural NIH HHS Z01 AI001064NIAID NIH HHS 1 R21 AI01064NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI101064NIAID NIH HHS R33 AI101064NINDS NIH HHS 1 R01 NS076512NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS076512
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewWest Nile virus (WNV) is the most important cause of epidemic encephalitis in the United States. We review articles published in the last 18 months related to the epidemiology, immunology, clinical features, and treatment of this disease. RECENT

findingsThere was a resurgence in WNV disease in the United States in 2012. The WNV strain now predominant in the United States (NA/WN02) differs from the initial emergent isolate in 1999 (NY99). However, differences in the genetics of currently circulating United States WNV strains do not explain variations in epidemic magnitude or disease severity. Innate and acquired immunity are critical in control of WNV, and in some cases pathways are central nervous system specific. The clinical features of infection are now well understood, although nonconfirmed observations of chronic viral excretion in urine remain controversial. There is no specific antiviral therapy for WNV, but studies of antivirals specific for other flaviviruses may identify agents with promise against WNV. Phase I and II human WNV vaccine clinical trials have established that well tolerated and immunogenic WNV vaccines can be developed. SUMMARY: WNV remains an important public health problem. Although recent studies have significantly increased our understanding of host immune and genetic factors involved in control of WNV infection, no specific therapy is yet available. Development of a well tolerated, immunogenic, and effective vaccine against WNV is almost certainly feasible, but economic factors and the lack of predictability of the magnitude and location of outbreaks are problematic for designing phase III trials and ultimate licensure.

Indexed as

EpidemicsAntiviral AgentsHumansUnited StatesWest Nile FeverWest Nile virusWest Nile Virus VaccinesAntiviral AgentsWest Nile Virus Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID24722324
PMCPMC4050660
OpenAlexW2040236124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.