Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24722301›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2014

Effect of structural remodeling (retraction and recoil) of the pipeline embolization device on aneurysm occlusion rate.

L-D Jou, B D Mitchell, H M Shaltoni, M E Mawad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Two- to five-year follow-up of 78 patients after treatment with the Flow Redirection Endoluminal Device.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2020
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Metal coverage ratio of pipeline embolization device for treatment of unruptured aneurysms: Reality check.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

L-D JouFrom the Departments of Radiology (L.-D.J., H.M.S., M.E.M.) jou@bcm.tmc.edu.
B D MitchellNeurosurgery (B.D.M.), Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
H M ShaltoniFrom the Departments of Radiology (L.-D.J., H.M.S., M.E.M.).
M E MawadFrom the Departments of Radiology (L.-D.J., H.M.S., M.E.M.).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeDuring endovascular treatment of unruptured aneurysms with the Pipeline Embolization Device, an oversized device is often selected to achieve better wall apposition; however, this device oversizing could be related to overelongation and possible delayed enlargement of the stented region. The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between oversize and treatment outcome. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe DynaCT images of 14 aneurysms treated by a single Pipeline Embolization Device were retrospectively analyzed. 3D images of the deployed device were compared with those acquired at the 6-month follow-up for qualitative and quantitative evaluation. The diameter and length of the Pipeline Embolization Device were measured at both time points and compared for determination of the device changes.

resultsStructural changes of the device have been observed, and it was found that the Pipeline Embolization Device influences the vessel curvature in some cases. On average, it increases its diameter by 0.23 mm and decreases its length by 2.88 mm within 6 months of initial deployment. Excessive elongation beyond its nominal length is correlated with a lower aneurysm occlusion rate at the 6-month follow-up.

conclusionsNot only does a Pipeline Embolization Device reconstruct the aneurysm and parent artery, but its entire structure goes through a gradual remodeling process. The relative deformation between the device and the artery indicates suboptimal wall apposition. Device oversizing does not have a direct effect on shortening or recoil. The aneurysm occlusion rate, however, is lowered by overelongation of the Pipeline Embolization Device.

Indexed as

ArteriesCerebral AngiographyEmbolization, TherapeuticHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalIntracranial AneurysmMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID24722301
PMCPMC7966279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.