Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24722184›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2014

Proteomics analysis of melanoma metastases: association between S100A13 expression and chemotherapy resistance.

A Azimi, M Pernemalm, M Frostvik Stolt, J Hansson, J Lehtiö, S Egyházi Brage, C Hertzman Johansson

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. RAGE Signaling in Melanoma Tumors.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

A AzimiDepartment of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, CCK R8:03, Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, S-17176 Stockholm, Sweden.
M PernemalmDepartment of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Science for Life Laboratory, Tomtebodavägen 23, S-17165 Solna, Sweden.
M Frostvik StoltDepartment of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, CCK R8:03, Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, S-17176 Stockholm, Sweden.
J HanssonDepartment of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, CCK R8:03, Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, S-17176 Stockholm, Sweden.
J LehtiöDepartment of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Science for Life Laboratory, Tomtebodavägen 23, S-17165 Solna, Sweden.
S Egyházi BrageDepartment of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, CCK R8:03, Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, S-17176 Stockholm, Sweden.
C Hertzman JohanssonDepartment of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, CCK R8:03, Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, S-17176 Stockholm, Sweden.
Karolinska University Hospital · SEScience for Life Laboratory · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDisseminated cutaneous malignant melanoma (CMM) is commonly unresponsive to standard chemotherapies, and there are as yet no predictive markers of therapy response.

methodsIn the present study we collected fresh-frozen pretreatment lymph-node metastasis samples (n=14) from melanoma patients with differential response to dacarbazine (DTIC) or temozolomide (TMZ) chemotherapy, to identify proteins with an impact on treatment response. We performed quantitative protein profiling using tandem mass spectrometry and compared the proteome differences between responders (R) and non-responders (NR), matched for age, gender and histopathological type of CMM.

resultsBiological pathway analyses showed several signalling pathways differing between R vs NR, including Rho signalling. Gene expression profiling data was available for a subset of the samples, and the results were compared with the proteomics data. Four proteins with differential expression between R and NR were selected for technical validation by immunoblotting (ISYNA1, F13A1, CSTB and S100A13), and CSTB and S100A13 were further validated on a larger sample set by immunohistochemistry (n=48). The calcium binding protein S100A13 was found to be significantly overexpressed in NR compared with R in all analyses performed.

conclusionsOur results suggest that S100A13 is involved in CMM resistance to DTIC/TMZ.

Indexed as

Lymphatic MetastasisAdultAgedAntineoplastic AgentsCutaneous Malignant MelanomaCystatin BDacarbazineDrug Resistance, NeoplasmFactor XIIIFemaleGene Expression ProfilingHumansMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedMyo-Inositol-1-Phosphate SynthaseAntineoplastic AgentsCSTB protein, humanCystatin BDacarbazineFactor XIIIfactor XIII subunit AMyo-Inositol-1-Phosphate SynthaseNeoplasm ProteinsS100A13 protein, humanS100 ProteinsTemozolomide

Identifiers

PMID24722184
PMCPMC4021518
OpenAlexW2011784500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.